On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X) <
> Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact> wrote:
>
>> Is that really necessary? It seems superfluous.
>>
>
> It's necessary in that there's no other way to use this hardware from a W
Kyle and Chris,
Last week, when I talk with Yamaha, they say, they want to help Gecko
implementation for Web MIDI. So if you want QA, I will talk with about it.
On 2014/06/16 0:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
On the potential users side - Yamaha is already using WebMIDI in their eVY-1
project, and
On the potential users side - Yamaha is already using WebMIDI in their eVY-1
project, and numerous other vendors (Korg, Roland, et al) have expressed strong
interest. I'm happy to encourage the MMA and AMEI to post here if you'd like
more direct expression of interest. :)
For more on MIDI mark
On 6/9/2014 2:31 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
Portable C++ ABI:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4028.pdf
Perhaps a bit late to be saying this, but after reading this paper, I've
come to object to it.
A "portable" ABI can mean one of several things:
1. A well-defined,
> A bit off-topic, but do we at Mozilla have any kind of a (semi-)
> organized group of folks involved with C++ standardization? I follow
> along fairly closely (especially in SG7 - Reflection) and have a couple
> of proposals I'm thinking about, but that's strictly in my spare time.
> It'd be nice
5 matches
Mail list logo
