On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:32 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> There are some things that I do with trace-malloc that I'm not sure
> if the other tools do.
I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014341 for
removing trace-malloc. Please add any dependencies that I've missed.
Thanks!
On 2014-05-21, 5:15 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 5/21/14, 1:51 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
Or, alternatively, attempt to automate this with Autoland
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657828).
Is anyone actively working on Autoland? Rail had been working on
Autoland, but when I spoke wit
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> On 21.05.2014 21:59, Ralph Giles wrote:
> >On 2014-05-21 9:56 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> >
> >>checker. But it seems the Mozilla codes uses this API for many things
> >>linked to video stuff:
> >>https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozi
On 5/21/14, 1:51 PM, Mike Conley wrote:
Or, alternatively, attempt to automate this with Autoland
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657828).
Is anyone actively working on Autoland? Rail had been working on
Autoland, but when I spoke with him in 2013 Q4, I think he said he would
no
>> I try to mentor as many bugs as possible. My ideal workflow would be to
>> grant r+, suggest a try: string, and set checkin-needed in a single act,
>> without having to determine whether the contributor has try access and/or
>> editbugs. If we already have people scanning for checkin-needed and
On 21.05.2014 21:59, Ralph Giles wrote:
On 2014-05-21 9:56 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
checker. But it seems the Mozilla codes uses this API for many things
linked to video stuff:
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?find=%2F&string=QTKit
This is all video capture code for WebRTC.
The Web APIs documentation meeting is Friday at 9 AM Pacific Time.
Everyone's welcome to attend; if you're interested in ensuring that Web
APIs are properly documented, we'd love your input.
We have an agenda, as well as details on how to join, here:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/WebAPI-docs-20
On 2014-05-21 9:56 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> checker. But it seems the Mozilla codes uses this API for many things
> linked to video stuff:
> https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?find=%2F&string=QTKit
This is all video capture code for WebRTC. What API does Apple recommend
instead
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Wed 21 May 2014 08:42:28 AM PDT, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> > Level 1 - Try/User/Incubator Access
> > Because this is all it gives, this sort of access can be given out
> generously to anyone who would find it convenient when helping us or
>
> There are existing libraries that can transform tokenized fields to
> postal-compatible blobs; engineers at Google have referred us to
> libaddressinput [5]. However, this API seems incomplete. For example,
> the CN query at [6] lists only city and state as required
> administrative levels, where
On 21.05.2014 18:35, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 5/21/14, 3:08 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
Mozilla code base (still) relies on OSX QuickTime API. But, this API was
deprecated by Apple a few months ago.
Which APIs? Can you be more specific?
I don't have more information given by the Apple OSX
On 21/05/14 12:35 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
>> As a consequence:
>> * New Mozilla based app. are not accepted anymore in OSX app. store
>> * Apple moving pretty fast forward, Mozilla code might be unable to run
>> on future OSX major release.
>
> The first isn't a significant concern, since Firefox
On 5/21/14, 3:08 AM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
Mozilla code base (still) relies on OSX QuickTime API. But, this API was
deprecated by Apple a few months ago.
Which APIs? Can you be more specific?
As a consequence:
* New Mozilla based app. are not accepted anymore in OSX app. store
* Apple mo
On Wed 21 May 2014 08:42:28 AM PDT, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> Level 1 - Try/User/Incubator Access
> Because this is all it gives, this sort of access can be given out generously
> to anyone who would find it convenient when helping us or working on a
> developer's personal project, without worry
> One issue I often run into is that the contributor doesn't have access to
> try, and pushing it on their behalf disrupts the rhythm of the other things
> I'm doing.
>From http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/commit-access-policy/
Level 1 - Try/User/Incubator Access
Because this is all it gives, this
On 2014-05-21, 4:38 AM, Frederik Braun wrote:
On 20.05.2014 23:33, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-05-20, 2:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Justin Dolske
wrote:
However we do implement some additional features in private browsing
mode. For example we disable link c
On 2014-05-21, 7:40 AM, Nicolas Silva wrote:
Sorry, my example was not clear enough. The issue with using namespace +
unifoed builds is that the using namespace declaration applies to all
(or most) of the headers included in the unified translation unit. So
using namespace mozilla at the top of e
Sorry, my example was not clear enough. The issue with using namespace +
unifoed builds is that the using namespace declaration applies to all (or
most) of the headers included in the unified translation unit. So using
namespace mozilla at the top of each .cpp is harmless until we include
third par
Benoit Jacob has also recently joined the team.
-Brad
On 5/21/14, 3:11 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
In case you missed Blake Kaplan's announcement at Mozilla's All-Hands
meeting a couple weeks ago, allow me to introduce the expanding e10s
engineering team!
e10s is a priority for Mozilla's enginee
Hi,
Mozilla code base (still) relies on OSX QuickTime API. But, this API was
deprecated by Apple a few months ago.
As a consequence:
* New Mozilla based app. are not accepted anymore in OSX app. store
* Apple moving pretty fast forward, Mozilla code might be unable to run
on future OSX major
Android and B2G got fixed to use #pragma GCC visibility. So, we can go
ahead and remove all NS_HIDDEN-related code now.
This also means that when modifying Android and B2G-specific code that uses
symbols imported from other dynamic libraries, you will need to add to
config/system-headers (when inc
I _almost_ did a little dance in my room to celebrate this news, it’s such a
valuable project for Firefox!
Please sign me up for any find bar related bugs, Tom and I worked on it before
anyways.
Go get ‘em and… have fun!
Mike.
On 21 May 2014, at 09:11, Chris Peterson wrote:
> In case you mi
On 21.05.2014 01:27, Rik Cabanier wrote:
Likewise here. I don't think anyone is saying that "hardwareConcurrency"
is failing on the grounds of exposing too much system information alone.
The way I read this thread, people either aren't convinced that it's the
right compromise given its usefulness
On 20.05.2014 23:33, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-05-20, 2:25 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Justin Dolske
>> wrote:
>> However we do implement some additional features in private browsing
>> mode. For example we disable link coloring. I'm not sure what the
>> exac
In case you missed Blake Kaplan's announcement at Mozilla's All-Hands
meeting a couple weeks ago, allow me to introduce the expanding e10s
engineering team!
e10s is a priority for Mozilla's engineering management and they are
dedicating more help to make it happen. We've picked up some Firefox
25 matches
Mail list logo
