Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
They key magic was that NS_DECLARE_STATIC_IID_ACCESSOR is specialized
on the type itself and not on a dummy class.
I had tried specialising on the type itself, but the way I originally
did it was only a link error rather than a compile error. I had also
tried templat
On 2014-02-28 17:24 , Hal Wine wrote:
> tl;dr: what is the balance point between pushes to try taking too long
> and loosing repository history of recent try pushes?
Based on the responses to this specific question, we'll go back to
waiting for developers to notify IT when there is enough performan
On 3/6/2014 4:05 PM, Benoit Girard wrote:
Thanks for doing this.
However I feel like our options for code that need preferences off the main
thread are a bit poor.
Yes. This is mostly intentional, because it's unusual to actually have
user preferences affect threaded code behavior in ways that
On Feb 23, 2014, at 5:17 PM, evacc...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 21, 2013 8:54:24 AM UTC-6, tric...@accusoft.com wrote:
>>> - I suppose that the final lossless step used for JPEGs was the usual
>>> Huffman encoding and not arithmetic coding, have you considered testing the
>>> later
Why did you choose jpeg quality as your independent variable? Wouldn't it make
more sense to use the similarity value? When trying to match other formats to
the jpeg's value, you can get close but can't exactly match it. This creates an
inherent bias.
So for one thing, the data should have incl
On 3/6/2014 8:32 PM, Neil wrote:
Because of the way GetIID/NS_GET_IID works, it's not very easy to get
the compiler to tell you when you're doing it wrong. So far I've come
up with a way to get the linker to do it. I'm trying to get the
compiler to do it, but the results aren't perfect. However
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
> On 03/04/2014 03:13 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>
>> It saddens me that we are using non-compliant ad hoc parsers when we
>> already have two spec-compliant (at least at some point in time) ones.
>
> Interesting! I assume you are referring
L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2014-03-07 01:32 +, Neil wrote:
I noticed a couple of places that queried for a concrete class which didn't
have its own IID, which means that you end up querying for the base interface
instead.
Does the solution we use for do_QueryFrame work here
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:23 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> W3C recently published the following proposed edited recommendations
> (the stage before W3C's final stage, Recommendation, but to revise
> an existing recommendation, and thus also simultaneously like a last
> call) related to MathML:
>
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
