Re: Intent to ship DOM Promises

2014-01-30 Thread Jason Orendorff
On 1/30/14 9:06 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/30/14 5:03 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote: >> What are the plans for moving Promises into SpiderMonkey? > > Moving Promises per se is not hard. > > The hard part is that this requires SpiderMonkey to grow a concept of > an even loop. The event loop itse

Re: A proposal to reduce the number of styles in Mozilla code

2014-01-30 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Anthony Jones wrote: >> >> This tool is not going to be very helpful in a lot of modules until we >> do style-rewriting. I'm not about to start taking piecemeal >> 2-space-indented patches in XPConnect. > > When I said "style rewriting" I was referring to changing

Re: Intent to ship DOM Promises

2014-01-30 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 1/30/14 5:03 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote: What are the plans for moving Promises into SpiderMonkey? Moving Promises per se is not hard. The hard part is that this requires SpiderMonkey to grow a concept of an even loop. And then we have to decide whether it's built-in or embedding-provid

Re: A proposal to reduce the number of styles in Mozilla code

2014-01-30 Thread Anthony Jones
On 30/01/14 10:42, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Anthony Jones > wrote: > > I don't think we should attempt style rewriting. > > One thing I wanted to explain is why I have focussed on > clang-format-diff more than clang-format. My

Re: Intent to ship DOM Promises

2014-01-30 Thread Till Schneidereit
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:07 PM, wrote: > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 10:35:24 AM UTC-8, Nikhil Marathe wrote: > > As off January 28, our DOM Promises implementation implements the es6 > > > > promises spec. [1] > > > > It is feature complete, and passes the Promises/A+ tests. [2] > > > > I in