Re: .elementFromPoint including XBL anonymous nodes?

2013-11-10 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > Is there a chrome-only API like .elementFromPoint that will tell me which > XBL anonymous element is at a point? > I don't think so. You probably need to add another parameter to nsIDOMWindowUtils::nodesFromRect (threaded through to nsDoc

Re: PSA: The profiling branch has shut down

2013-11-10 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2013-11-09 6:30 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 11/9/13 12:53 PM, Philip Chee wrote: Not directly related but. Some time back I wanted to turn on profiling for SeaMonkey on our trunk builds but was vetoed because turning on profiling (I was told) causes a pref hit. It does, but a pretty small o

Re: .elementFromPoint including XBL anonymous nodes?

2013-11-10 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
nsIDOMDocumentXBL has some methods for dealing with XBL anonymous elements. You can't do hit-testing on those elements but perhaps you can use those methods to figure out whether the element at hand is an XBL anonymous element? Cheers, Ehsan On 2013-11-09 10:32 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:

Re: Plug-in feature not available in the web platform. Alternatives?

2013-11-10 Thread Brian Smith
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 AM, fma spew wrote: > We have a npapi-npruntime plug-in that access the Windows certificate store > via CAPI to provide the end-user with its personal certificates to perform > different operations. We can and should switch from using NSS to using the CAPI personal cer

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-10 Thread Nicholas Cameron
On Friday, November 8, 2013 10:12:02 PM UTC+13, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > Throwing out non-OMTC OGL without putting effort into making OMTC > > > OGL as functional would be doing just that. > > > > > > > Hmm. In what way is OMTC OGL le

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-10 Thread Nicholas Cameron
On Friday, November 8, 2013 3:37:49 PM UTC+13, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > > > It is a major discouragement to contributors when their efforts > > are regressed or discarded because they are in the way and don't > > matter. It wouldn't be reasonable to continue to expect > > contributions after d

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-10 Thread Nicholas Cameron
On Friday, November 8, 2013 10:19:45 AM UTC+13, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > Then we have some time to discover whether there are any > > show-stopper OMTC issues, and we reduce the time frame for other > > branches between paying the price and reaping the returns. We already paying the price on nig

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-10 Thread Nicholas Cameron
On Friday, November 8, 2013 12:49:46 AM UTC+13, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Nicholas Cameron wrote: > > > In the long term, OMTC basic layers will be the default for Linux and > > > forcing HWA will give OpenGL OMTC as expected. > > > > Do I understand correctly tha

Re: Add-on File Registration PRD

2013-11-10 Thread Dephormation
On 30/10/2013 21:55, Jorge Villalobos wrote: Cross posting to dev.planning, where I originally intended this to be. Please follow up to dev.planning. Jorge On 10/30/13 3:42 PM, Jorge Villalobos wrote: Hello! As many of you know, the Add-ons Team, User Advocacy Team, Firefox Team and others ha