On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
>
> - Finish fixing the devtools leaks:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=932880.
Fixed on mozilla-central and backported to aurora, beta, and
b2g26_v1_2. Nothing more to do.
> - Finish fixing the social API leaks:
> https
On 11/7/2013 5:42 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Do Thunderbird developers want to keep decoders that are going away
from Firefox? These include:
I don't think any Thunderbird developer is well-informed on the issue of
charsets in email. The only non-web charset I know we need is the IMAP
modified UT
Andreas Gal writes:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
>>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
these or the already-known issues?
On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
> On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>>> Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
>>> these or the already-known issues?
>>
>> Its not a priority
Nicholas Cameron schrieb:
Our goal is (basically) to be OMTC everywhere
I have been using OMTC on Linux for a while (with both prefs on,
actually) and with the exception of
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934250 everything works
really fine (but then, I'm on the newest kernel/d
On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> > Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixing
> > these or the already-known issues?
>
> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take contributed
> patche
On Thursday 2013-11-07 14:13 +0200, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> > I'm just afraid we're going to end up in the same situation we're already in
> > with intermittent failures where the developer looks at it and says "that
> > couldn't possibly be
(Not replying to anyone in particular, just replying to the lastest email
in this thread at this point: ) Let's not transform the original
conversation here, which was purely a technical conversation about
improving the way we do compositing on Linux, into a prioritization
conversation, which would
Andreas Gal writes:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>
>> Andreas Gal writes:
>>
>>> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
>>> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
>>> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Andreas Gal writes:
>
>> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
>> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
>> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
>
> Do bugs in B2G Desktop
Andreas Gal writes:
> Its not a priority to fix Linux/X11. We will happily take
> contributed patches, and people are welcome to fix issues they
> see, as long its not at the expense of the things that matter.
Do bugs in B2G Desktop on Linux/X11 matter?
I assume glitches and perf issues that are
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> Nicholas Cameron writes:
>
>> Currently on Linux our only 'supported' graphics backend is the
>> main-thread software backend (basic layers).
>
> FWIW basic layers is predominantly GPU-based compositing
> (not-softwared) on most X11 systems.
Nicholas Cameron writes:
> Currently on Linux our only 'supported' graphics backend is the
> main-thread software backend (basic layers).
FWIW basic layers is predominantly GPU-based compositing
(not-softwared) on most X11 systems.
> 5) We would love to spend time making OMTC OpenGL on Linux wor
Do we still really need the legacy Mac encodings and JOHAB in order to
make sense of fonts?
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/gfx/thebes/gfxFontUtils.cpp#1139
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
http://hsivonen.fi/
___
dev-platform mailing
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> What do we gain by having results that can't be trusted?
The same that we gain from allowing any try pushes that don't run
every single test. It's a tradeoff between reliability and time, not
black-and-white. For instance, if I change a
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Nicholas Cameron wrote:
> In the long term, OMTC basic layers will be the default for Linux and
> forcing HWA will give OpenGL OMTC as expected.
Do I understand correctly that all these users will get OMTC basic
layers as the long-term solution?
* Don't have 3D dr
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> If Thunderbird still wants to have these, I think they should take
> them into comm-central.
This bit was buried in the large email, so let's highlight it separately.
Do Thunderbird developers want to keep decoders that are going away
from
17 matches
Mail list logo
