webidl events and JS implementations

2013-11-04 Thread Fabrice Desré
In the download api we are working on for b2g, a download event in webidl looks like: [Constructor(DOMString type, optional DownloadEventInit eventInitDict)] interface DownloadEvent : Event { readonly attribute DOMDownload? download; }; dictionary DownloadEventInit : EventInit { DOMDownload

Recommendations for new test cluster

2013-11-04 Thread Pasha, Amjad
Hello, We are building a new cluster to test local storage failover and high availability. Also to thoroughly run full integration testing of our MarkLogic search apps along with transition from a shared storage to local. 1. what is the minimum recommended nodes to setup a cluster resembling

Bug Number for Add-on File Registration PRD?

2013-11-04 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/30/2013 2:55 PM, Jorge Villalobos wrote: > Cross posting to dev.planning, where I originally intended this to be. > Please follow up to dev.planning. > > Jorge > > On 10/30/13 3:42 PM, Jorge Villalobos wrote: >> Hello! >> >> As many of you know, the Add-ons Team, User Advocacy Team, Firefox

Re: Mozilla development "bootcamp"

2013-11-04 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On 11/3/2013 8:48 PM, Sankha Narayan Guria wrote: > One thing that I have noticed after talking to many new contributors is > that, people are often overwhelmed by the large amount of the docs. They > look for quick results when they are starting off. > > The idea of videos is great, but it would a

DOM Bindings Meeting - Monday (today) @ 12:30 PM PDT

2013-11-04 Thread Andrew McCreight
Our weekly-ish DOM bindings meetings continue on Monday Nov 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM PDT. http://arewemeetingyet.com/Los%20Angeles/Mon/12:30/w/DOM%20Bindings%20Meeting Dial-in Info: - Vidyo room: Boris Zbarsky ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@li

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Data Activity, {Data, CSV} on the Web

2013-11-04 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > Well, it's not clear to me if "Standard method(s) to find the data > described by the metadata" would turn out to be a simple > .responseType/.response proposal so this might be relevant. Which proposal has something XHR-relevant in it

Rendering meeting, Monday 5;30pm PDT ("the later time")

2013-11-04 Thread Milan Sreckovic
(this meeting is scheduled in Pacific time zone; note that means a different time for Taipei, New Zealand, Australia, etc. now) The Rendering meeting is about all things Gfx, Image, Layout, and Media. It takes place every second Monday, alternating between 2:30pm PDT and 5:30pm PDT. The next m

Re: Add-on File Registration PRD

2013-11-04 Thread Axel Hecht
Hi, read the thread now. I ignored it based on the subject, btw, didn't seem to affect anything in real life from just glancing at that. I'd like to get langpacks excluded. Maybe we need to make their abilities to do stuff more robustly checked, but for a localizer wanting to test their work

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Data Activity, {Data, CSV} on the Web

2013-11-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > Well, it's not clear to me if "Standard method(s) to find the data > described by the metadata" would turn out to be a simple > .responseType/.response proposal so this might be relevant. > > An "abstain" for this one seems not very fri

Re: Add-on File Registration PRD

2013-11-04 Thread Axel Hecht
On 11/4/13 9:41 AM, Onno Ekker wrote: Jorge Villalobos wrote: Cross posting to dev.planning, where I originally intended this to be. Please follow up to dev.planning. Jorge On 10/30/13 3:42 PM, Jorge Villalobos wrote: Hello! As many of you know, the Add-ons Team, User Advocacy Team, Firefox

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Data Activity, {Data, CSV} on the Web

2013-11-04 Thread Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
(2013/10/29 18:22), Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28 PM, L. David Baron wrote: >> W3C is proposing a data activity (an area of work) > >> Please reply to this thread if you think >> there's something we should say. > > Maybe it would make sense to abstain explicitly, sinc

Re: Mozilla development "bootcamp"

2013-11-04 Thread Till Schneidereit
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > On 04/11/13, 10:30 , Neil wrote: > >> Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: >> >> On 03/11/13, 11:46 , Neil wrote: >>> >>> 14. Rebasing a bitrotted patch > 14.0 What it looks like when you qpush a patch that has conflics > 14.1 Open a rej file

Re: Mozilla development "bootcamp"

2013-11-04 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 04/11/13, 10:30 , Neil wrote: Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: On 03/11/13, 11:46 , Neil wrote: 14. Rebasing a bitrotted patch 14.0 What it looks like when you qpush a patch that has conflics 14.1 Open a rej file 14.2 Apply the change to the file Shouldn't be necessary these days ;-) Uh, why

Re: Mozilla development "bootcamp"

2013-11-04 Thread Neil
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: On 03/11/13, 11:46 , Neil wrote: 14. Rebasing a bitrotted patch 14.0 What it looks like when you qpush a patch that has conflics 14.1 Open a rej file 14.2 Apply the change to the file Shouldn't be necessary these days ;-) Uh, why not? hg pull --rebase works on y

Re: Add-on File Registration PRD

2013-11-04 Thread Onno Ekker
Jorge Villalobos wrote: > Cross posting to dev.planning, where I originally intended this to be. > Please follow up to dev.planning. > > Jorge > > On 10/30/13 3:42 PM, Jorge Villalobos wrote: >> Hello! >> >> As many of you know, the Add-ons Team, User Advocacy Team, Firefox Team >> and others hav