Re: Poll: What do you need in MXR/DXR?

2013-10-04 Thread Cameron McCormack
Brian Smith wrote: * When in blame mode, the revision number of the most change to the line is shown. I would like a link next to every line's revision number that links to the *previous* revision where the line changed. That way, I can navigate the change history much easier. Yes, I think bein

Re: Poll: What do you need in MXR/DXR?

2013-10-04 Thread Erik Rose
That should be easy enough; I expect it doesn't have any dependencies the mainline moz-central has. I'll add it to the list to try for in Q4! On Oct 2, 2013, at 13:33 , Mike Conley wrote: > I love DXR for mozilla-central, and would love it if the UX branch > (https://mxr.mozilla.org/projects-c

Re: Poll: What do you need in MXR/DXR?

2013-10-04 Thread Nicolas B. Pierron
On 10/03/2013 02:38 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2013-10-03 3:24 PM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote: The code base is compiled for multiple platforms. Currently I cannot find the functions which are defined on ARM unless we use a search as we used to do on MXR. This is a fundamental problem with DXR

Re: Poll: What do you need in MXR/DXR?

2013-10-04 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Erik Rose writes: > > What features do you most use in MXR and DXR? This is probably rather low priority, but MXR can be loaded over https, and DXR can not currently. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozill

Re: Add-ons Firefox 24 crash due to recent change in JSAPI

2013-10-04 Thread Vasu Yadav
On Friday, October 4, 2013 6:16:36 PM UTC+5:30, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > > > > > Based on my understanding, I need to create a JS XPCOM component apart > > > from the existing C++ XPCOM component I already have. All the JavaScript > > > function calls nee

Re: Add-ons Firefox 24 crash due to recent change in JSAPI

2013-10-04 Thread Bobby Holley
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > Based on my understanding, I need to create a JS XPCOM component apart > from the existing C++ XPCOM component I already have. All the JavaScript > function calls need to be made from JS XPCOM component. > Precisely. > How will the C++ XPCOM and JS XPCO

Re: Add-ons Firefox 24 crash due to recent change in JSAPI

2013-10-04 Thread vasuyadavkrishn
On Thursday, October 3, 2013 6:51:10 PM UTC+5:30, Bobby Holley wrote: > You should call Javascript functions from JS. If your app is mostly C++, > > then you can use a JS-implemented XPCOM component to do the JS work. If > > your core logic is easily convertible to JS, then you should do that, an

Re: Add-ons Firefox 24 crash due to recent change in JSAPI

2013-10-04 Thread vasuyadavkrishn
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:06:30 AM UTC+5:30, vasuyad...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi > > > > We are facing problem with our Add-ons support for FireFox 24.Firefox is > crashing. In earlier approach we was using 'JS_GetGlobalObject' to get global > object from docShell. > https://developer