> hi kats (cross-posting to dev-b2g);
>
> tl:dr; we think all is ok again, details below. To avoid this happening
> again this week, we're changing tryserver to reduce the number of
> Android-tests-run-on-tegra-by-default. If you specifically want tegra
> testing on tryserver, you will need to sta
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Julian Seward wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 11:08 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> > On 9/12/13 6:35 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> Note we have *many* inline functions that the compiler decide to never
> >> inline. We should maybe try to detect those on all platforms and
I suppose that that metric will be different between compilers (msvc vs gcc vs
clang (which we don't officially build with, but I bet is the easiest to get
the info out of)), and possibly between platforms, versions, etc. I wouldn't be
surprised if the context in which the header is included mak
On 09/12/2013 11:08 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> On 9/12/13 6:35 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Note we have *many* inline functions that the compiler decide to never
>> inline. We should maybe try to detect those on all platforms and move
>> those functions out of headers.
>
> gcc -Winline will report
On 9/12/13 6:35 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
Note we have *many* inline functions that the compiler decide to never
inline. We should maybe try to detect those on all platforms and move
those functions out of headers.
gcc -Winline will report uninlined "inline" functions, but the warnings
are VERY n
Thanks John, this looks like it strikes a good balance between reducing
tegra load and getting false-positives in try runs.
Just for anybody following along though, it looks like bug 915465 (which
deployed this change) is still in flux so things may have not completely
settled yet. See also
h
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:19:54AM -0400, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> 2013/9/12 Avi Hal
>
> > On Sunday, September 8, 2013 6:22:01 AM UTC+3, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems that we have some much-included header files including
> >
> > >
> > > just to get std::min and st
2013/9/12 Avi Hal
> On Sunday, September 8, 2013 6:22:01 AM UTC+3, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > It seems that we have some much-included header files including
>
> >
> > just to get std::min and std::max.
> >
>
> Is it because min/max are used at the h file?
Yes.
can it be dele
8 matches
Mail list logo