Re: std::unique_ptr, std::move,

2013-08-07 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > >> On 2013-08-02 4:49 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> >>> That sounds reasonable to me. So, based on that then, let's get back to >>> my >>> original question that motivated the discussion of th

Re: std::unique_ptr, std::move,

2013-08-07 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:14:10AM +0200, Brian Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari >wrote: > > > > > This adds too much risk of security patches failing to backport from > > > > > >> mozilla-central to ESR 24. Rem

Re: Intent to implement: NavigationController

2013-08-07 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:17 PM, wrote: > On Monday, August 5, 2013 10:01:06 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote: > > On 26/07/13 18:29, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > > > > > We're planning to implement a prototype of the NavigationController > > > > > interface (see bug 898524). We will try to get feedback

Re: Standard C/C++ and Mozilla

2013-08-07 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
(Sorry for the late reply, please blame it on Canadian statutory holidays, and my birthday date!) On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > >> On 2013-08-02 5:21 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> >>> 3. How should we handle bridge suppo

Re: Flash and e10s

2013-08-07 Thread Jet Villegas
Mozilla proposed the NPAPI changes to get rid of windowed plug-ins [1] but there wasn't a big enough reason to change the Flash Player at that time--the threat of content breakage wasn't that high. If content breakage is certain via multi-process with windowed plug-ins, then Adobe will likely be

Re: Flash and e10s

2013-08-07 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > The primary reason I know for windowed Flash to be a huge PITA is because > of the deadlock issues caused by attached input queues. I'd love to force > Flash to be windowless and use our fullscreen support instead of their own > windows, b

Re: Removing support for OS/2

2013-08-07 Thread dmik
четверг, 8 августа 2013 г., 0:48:04 UTC+4 пользователь Chris Peterson написал: > Why does the OS/2 port need a different build system? I'm not familiar > > with OS/2 development, but is GNU Make not an option? If it were only GNU Make it wouldn't be such a problem (we have quite a recent GNU M

Re: Removing support for OS/2

2013-08-07 Thread Chris Peterson
On 8/7/13 1:00 PM, d...@dmik.org wrote: What about switching the build system, it's not our primary task of course but it will be done sooner or later — this is all to have a more robust build environment Why does the OS/2 port need a different build system? I'm not familiar with OS/2 develo

Re: Removing support for OS/2

2013-08-07 Thread dmik
пятница, 2 августа 2013 г., 3:13:23 UTC+4 пользователь Gregory Szorc написал: > Are there any objections to this proposal? Hello everybody, I'm the person who's being actively working now on getting Mozilla build on OS/2 again with all the new IPC stuff in. As Peter said, at the present time we

Re: Flash and e10s

2013-08-07 Thread Benjamin Smedberg
On 8/6/2013 8:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s. Who were you talking to? John Schoenick currently owns that bug, although I don't think he's working on it yet. We've talked about it on an off. Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possi