On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Markus Stange wrote:
> On 07.08.13 06:39, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> Running windowed Flash within the content process itself would mean giving
>> that content process access to the main window's HWND.
>>
>
> What would be the disadvantages of forcing wmode="tra
On 07.08.13 06:39, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Running windowed Flash within the content process itself would mean giving
that content process access to the main window's HWND.
What would be the disadvantages of forcing wmode="transparent" for
content process flash?
Markus
_
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> > I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
> >
> > Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possible but would be a ton of
> > work. Flash is on a downward trajector
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
>
> Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possible but would be a ton of
> work. Flash is on a downward trajectory and it would be a shame to do a ton
> of work to support somethi
I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possible but would be a ton of
work. Flash is on a downward trajectory and it would be a shame to do a ton
of work to support something that may not be relevant for much longer.
One idea I had is thi
On 6/08/2013 2:30 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
We also get worse thumbnails than before on pages that are basically
just a big login screen when you aren't actually logged in.
In the short-term, bug 897880 might help with that - it will arrange so
that an error response (roughly, a non 2XX respons
On Saturday, August 3, 2013 8:21:57 AM UTC-4, Paolo Amadini wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> if you are maintaining an add-on or a Mozilla product that interacts
>
> with downloads, you should look into updating your code to use the new
>
> Downloads.jsm module instead of nsIDownloadManager as soon as
Paolo Amadini schrieb:
The Downloads back-end will not call any method of nsIDownloadManagerUI
anymore
So I cannot implement an alternative download manager any more?
Robert Kaiser
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https:/
Asa Dotzler schrieb:
We should evaluate, possibly through telemetry or FHR, how many users
are seeing the e10s thumbnails and if that number is high, I think we'll
want to change the criteria for when we go to the e10s thumbnails.
I saw a bug in a recent triage that said we are (or have been)
We've moved the meeting 2 hours earlier!
8 AM in California
11 AM in Toronto and New York, etc.
16:00 in the UK and Portugal
17:00 in most parts of Europe
23:00 in Taipei
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WebAPI+meeting&iso=20130806T08&p1=224&am=30
Meeting Detai
Hi, sorry for the delay to reply.
My change was performed mechanically without any tests.
So, I don't know if the OS/2 widget is actually alive.
However, I was requested a review of IME code for OS/2 on this June.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768742
Therefore, I was thinking th
11 matches
Mail list logo
