W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Tuesday, March 12. Please reply to
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
> The start of the discussion is that PGO for 32-bit builds will be
> really hard to maintain soon. If doing 64-bit PGO builds is costly and
> impairs the ability to deliver efficient 32-bits non-PGO builds then
> it's not compelling.
The assumption here seems to be tha
If we could identify some of the more popular add-ons that meet this criteria I
can add it to my test plan. I'll be testing this in Nightly on Tuesday.
Anthony Hughes
QA Engineer, Desktop Firefox
Mozilla Corporation
- Original Message -
> From: "Dave Townsend"
> To: dev-platform@lists.
On 2/8/2013 7:11 AM, Matt Brubeck wrote:
On 2/7/2013 6:12 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
- But really, what does it change for developers?
Almost nothing they shouldn't be doing already. The main difference is
that resource://app/ and resource://gre/ urls are not going to point to
the same location any
On 2/7/2013 6:12 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
- But really, what does it change for developers?
Almost nothing they shouldn't be doing already. The main difference is
that resource://app/ and resource://gre/ urls are not going to point to
the same location anymore, which means I won't have to file bug
5 matches
Mail list logo
