On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:49:01PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> The decrease is unfortunately not linear, as it seems like the big
> memory eater is LTCG, and unfortunately we cannot opt out of that if
> we want to do any PGO.
Well, LTCG is only going to compile objects that have been compiled
wi
On 2013-01-30 11:40 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ehsan Akhgari mailto:ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 2013-01-30 11:11 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
What about leaving PGO/LTCG enabled for a subset of our modules?
Is that
not a pos
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2013-01-30 11:11 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> What about leaving PGO/LTCG enabled for a subset of our modules? Is that
>> not a possible solution?
>>
>
> I did in fact measure that by disabling PGO/LTCG on all directories except
> con
On 2013-01-30 11:11 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
What about leaving PGO/LTCG enabled for a subset of our modules? Is that
not a possible solution?
I did in fact measure that by disabling PGO/LTCG on all directories
except content, dom, layout and xpcom. I can't seem to find the try
push righ
What about leaving PGO/LTCG enabled for a subset of our modules? Is that
not a possible solution?
Rob
--
Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the
Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority
over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants
(Follow-ups to dev-platform, please)
Dear all,
This email summarizes the results of our investigation on our options
with regard to the future of PGO optimizations on Windows. I will first
describe the work that happened as part of the investigation, and will
then propose a set of options on
Robert Relyea schrieb:
Switching to SQLite would make this a non-issue.
Is there a plan to do this? An open bug? Someone working on it?
Robert Kaiser
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev
Marionette is one of the core frameworks for testing FirefoxOS but works
pretty much everywhere since it is part Gecko.
You can see it on TBPL with
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&jobname=marionette for
example.
David
On 30/01/2013 18:33, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 1/30/201
On 2013-01-30 2:23 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
However, be warned that there are patches in bug 629500 to get rid of
nsIPrinterEnumerator entirely (though that bug seems to have stalled a
bit, so I don't know how soon that will happen).
It's blocked on Windows-specific fixes (bug 693230) -- it l
It looks like enumeratePrinters() was replaced by an attribute
"printerNameList" in this changeset:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d411716a02bc#l6.94
That attribute still exists on trunk, as shown here:
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/nsIPrintOptions.idl#64
Ho
On 01/30/2013 06:33 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 1/30/2013 2:13 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
A few of us got together last week and had a quick brainstorming
session about how to leverage the combined power from Mochitest and
Marionette better. The following issues were raised:
What is Marionett
On 1/30/2013 2:13 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
A few of us got together last week and had a quick brainstorming
session about how to leverage the combined power from Mochitest and
Marionette better. The following issues were raised:
What is Marionette? From the discussion, it sounds like a W3C testin
On 2013-01-30 11:38 AM, Kevin Brosnan wrote:
Does this remove any of the use cases? Such as the -private or
-private-toggle command line flag or the never remember history setting.
This is not going to change any of the features that are enabled in
Nightly now. I was just removing a whole bun
Does this remove any of the use cases? Such as the -private or
-private-toggle command line flag or the never remember history setting.
On Jan 29, 2013 12:25 PM, "Ehsan Akhgari" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to mention that I landed bug 817477 on mozilla-central
> earlier today, which re
I attended a W3C Testing Strategy meeting yesterday and the delta between our
test frameworks and testharness.js was discussed. The W3C is very interested in
getting our tests into their harness, and I shared some of the shortcomings
that I gathered from Jonas:
* It requires that all code is wr
I am all for moving towards Marionette being the basis of all
frameworks. It will allow us to share tests between other vendors
because Marionette is based on the W3C Browser Automation Spec[1].
One of the things that this brings up is how we can share between other
vendors. Testharness.js has
On 1/30/2013 5:56 AM, Neil wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> The fact that we are using gecko as the http server means a whole lot
>> of complications on mobile. In short, we currently need gecko both
>> compiled for android, which is the version of gecko being tested, and
>> compiled for a deskto
Jonas Sicking wrote:
The fact that we are using gecko as the http server means a whole lot of
complications on mobile. In short, we currently need gecko both compiled for
android, which is the version of gecko being tested, and compiled for a desktop
platform, which acts as host of the web se
.. docs say enumerateprinters() method is obsolete since 1.9 (Gecko)...
what replaces it ?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
19 matches
Mail list logo
