Re: Benefits of PGO on Windows

2012-10-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:55:57PM -0700, Dave Mandelin wrote: > Following the recent discussion about PGO, I really wanted to understand what > benefits PGO gives Firefox on Windows, if any--I was skeptical. Rafael (IIRC) > posted some Talos numbers, but I didn't know how to interpret them. So I

Re: Benefits of PGO on Windows

2012-10-17 Thread Taras Glek
On 10/17/2012 6:55 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote: Following the recent discussion about PGO, I really wanted to understand what benefits PGO gives Firefox on Windows, if any--I was skeptical. Rafael (IIRC) posted some Talos numbers, but I didn't know how to interpret them. So I decided to try a few s

Benefits of PGO on Windows

2012-10-17 Thread Dave Mandelin
Following the recent discussion about PGO, I really wanted to understand what benefits PGO gives Firefox on Windows, if any--I was skeptical. Rafael (IIRC) posted some Talos numbers, but I didn't know how to interpret them. So I decided to try a few simple experiments to try to falsify the hypot

try syntax for b2g-only

2012-10-17 Thread Steve Fink
While I was in the neighborhood of the relevant code, I looked into what it would take to add a b2g-only option to the try chooser syntax, and was surprised to discover that it's already possible. If you use |-p ics_armv7a_gecko| in your try syntax, it will select the B2G builds. It's combinab

Re: Easiest way to start using httpd.js?

2012-10-17 Thread Gregory Szorc
Sample standalone HTTP servers: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/214853a29174/services/common/modules-testing/aitcserver.js https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/214853a29174/services/common/modules-testing/storageserver.js Minimal JS files to launch said servers: https://hg.mo

Easiest way to start using httpd.js?

2012-10-17 Thread Jim Porter
I'm looking to write a fake server for the ActiveSync protocol, which I will eventually incorporate into xpcshell tests. httpd.js seems like the best tool for the job here. However, since the server is fairly complex, I wanted to be able to use XHRs in Firefox to talk to the server just to tes

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 2012-10-17 2:31 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: What would be interesting is if we could enable an autohinter in Firefox and use that in cases when we are sent a font which doesn't contain hints (is the performance overhead, if any, acceptable?) I don't have numbers, but I run my Linux desktop with

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Oct 17, 2012 11:20 AM, "Zack Weinberg" wrote: > > On 2012-10-17 11:05 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: >> >> AFAICS, the latest stable release is currently 2.4.10; do you know when >> 2.4.11 is expected? > > > Afraid not; we should probably ask Werner. It sounds to me that it's not generally true that

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 2012-10-17 11:05 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: AFAICS, the latest stable release is currently 2.4.10; do you know when 2.4.11 is expected? Afraid not; we should probably ask Werner. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://li

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 17/10/12 14:17, Zack Weinberg wrote: On 2012-10-17 4:07 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: Until quite recently the FreeType autohinter did a very bad job on a surprising number of popular webfonts - rendering letters in the same word with inconsi

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 2012-10-17 4:07 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: Until quite recently the FreeType autohinter did a very bad job on a surprising number of popular webfonts - rendering letters in the same word with inconsistent perceptual x-height, for instance.

Re: onHTTPSpyReadyStateChange not sent for aborted XHR?

2012-10-17 Thread Jan Honza Odvarko
On Oct 12, 2:05 pm, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > One of the Firebug automated tests is using following script to check > that XHR displayed in the Console panel (and the Net panel) is > properly finished if aborted: > > var request = new XMLHttpRequest(); > request.open("POST", "", true); > request.

Re: Flash Player freezes XULRunner

2012-10-17 Thread James Newell
Sorry for the late reply. Had a bit on lately. > You will need to get a debug build and a backtrace to answer that for > > sure, but with OOP plugins a Flash crash would (almost certainly) not > > crash XULRunner. I didn't get round to building a debug version. However after setting the XRE_C

Re: Freetype autohinter (was Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Fonts Working Group)

2012-10-17 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Until quite recently the FreeType autohinter did a very bad job on a > surprising number of popular webfonts - rendering letters in the same word > with inconsistent perceptual x-height, for instance. What kind of fonts? Bicameral or other?

Re: Off main thread file I/O

2012-10-17 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
On 10/16/12 9:05 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:> This is excellent - > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript_OS.File/OS.File_for_the_main_thread > is exactly the kind of API I've been wanting for a long time. I know > it took a lot of work to get there - thank you for your efforts. > > A coup