Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Justin Dolske
On 10/15/12 9:57 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: [...] But no matter what, this is unacceptable. If you can't be civil, please just don't say anything. Agreed. In such public discourse, civility and respect should be the norm. Justin ___ dev-platform mail

Re: Why we avoid making private modifications to NSPR and NSS (was Re: Imported code)

2012-10-15 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2012-10-15 5:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: Sure, I was not suggesting that. What I was suggesting was to take our implementation of the TimeStamp class for Windows and use the same ideas in the NSPR implementation of that function, for

Re: Concerning to Firefox OS binary on GalaxyS2

2012-10-15 Thread Pavel Franc
Hi, maybe this is the same bug as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801355 Pavel Franc Dne 15.10.2012 15:06, Wonsuk Lee napsal(a): > Hi. All. > > > > I tried to build the binary for GalaxyS2 with latest version of Firefox OS, > but it was not working. So I would like to ask the

Re: Why we avoid making private modifications to NSPR and NSS (was Re: Imported code)

2012-10-15 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > Sure, I was not suggesting that. What I was suggesting was to take our > implementation of the TimeStamp class for Windows and use the same ideas in > the NSPR implementation of that function, for callers who prefer to use the > PRTime API.

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Henrik Skupin
L. David Baron wrote on 10/15/12 4:31 PM: > There's a reviewed patch in > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788967 that adds > support for this, but apparently it had failures on try. Exactly what I need. Will watch when it lands. Thanks! -- Henrik ___

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 10/15/12 10:28 AM, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: > " Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can > be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." > > anybody else see problems here. No, explain? > i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shin

Re: Why we avoid making private modifications to NSPR and NSS (was Re: Imported code)

2012-10-15 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2012-10-14 6:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari mailto:ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>> wrote: In some cases in the past (such as bug 563082), we've needed to change the semantics of some of the NSPR functions to make them work better for some

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 15/10/12 15:28, alexander.alis...@gmail.com wrote: " Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? No, I don't see a problem there. WOFF *is* a

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2012-10-15 15:00 +0200, Henrik Skupin wrote: > Ted Mielczarek wrote on 10/15/12 2:16 PM: > > > The reftest manifest format (which crashtest uses, since crashtests > > run in the reftest harness) has explicit support for setting > > preferences per-test: > > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: WOFF File Format 1.0

2012-10-15 Thread alexander . alisani
" Any properly licensed TrueType/OpenType/Open Font Format file can be packaged in WOFF format for Web use." anybody else see problems here. W3C its main goal is to open standards right ? i think Mozilla's Jonathan Kew, needs to stick this where it does not shine

Concerning to Firefox OS binary on GalaxyS2

2012-10-15 Thread Wonsuk Lee
Hi. All. I tried to build the binary for GalaxyS2 with latest version of Firefox OS, but it was not working. So I would like to ask the questions to you guys. I got the source of Firefox OS (Version of Oct. 14th) with [1] instruction. Then, I refer the "GETTING AND BUILDING BOOT TO GECKO" part

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Henrik Skupin
Ted Mielczarek wrote on 10/15/12 2:16 PM: > The reftest manifest format (which crashtest uses, since crashtests > run in the reftest harness) has explicit support for setting > preferences per-test: > http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/tools/reftest/README.txt#160 Sounds good. I

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Henrik Skupin wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to start with crashtests for webrtc crashes which have been fixed > recently. Sadly this feature is disabled on mozilla-central and > mozilla-aurora. So I would have to set two preferences to get access to > all the feature

Re: nsresult is now a strongly typed enum

2012-10-15 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ted Mielczarek wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari >> wrote: >>> This is currently enabled on all compilers which support strongly typed >>> enums (recent clang, gcc >= 4.4, and Visual

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Henrik Skupin
Bobby Holley wrote on 10/15/12 2:12 PM: > Now that bug 792029 has landed, you should be able to use > SpecialPowers in crashtests. Wow, great response time and great answer! Thank you a lot Bobby! -- Henrik ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@li

Re: Call for help landing b2g patches on aurora

2012-10-15 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: > Landing on Aurora should be a simple matter of > > $ hg transplant -se /path/to/your/m-i/repo rev-to-land > # edit the commit message to include a=whoever > $ hg push Just wanted to point out that I have a little script you can configu

Re: Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Bobby Holley
Now that bug 792029 has landed, you should be able to use SpecialPowers in crashtests. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Henrik Skupin wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to start with crashtests for webrtc crashes which have been fixed > recently. Sadly this feature is disabled on mozilla-central and > m

Re: nsresult is now a strongly typed enum

2012-10-15 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ted Mielczarek wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari > wrote: >> This is currently enabled on all compilers which support strongly typed >> enums (recent clang, gcc >= 4.4, and Visual C++ 2012). > > So this is all of our official builds except

Are crashtests allowed to access chrome (e.g. set preferences)?

2012-10-15 Thread Henrik Skupin
Hi all, I want to start with crashtests for webrtc crashes which have been fixed recently. Sadly this feature is disabled on mozilla-central and mozilla-aurora. So I would have to set two preferences to get access to all the features. Now I see that crashtests are getting run through the reftest f

Re: nsresult is now a strongly typed enum

2012-10-15 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > This is currently enabled on all compilers which support strongly typed > enums (recent clang, gcc >= 4.4, and Visual C++ 2012). So this is all of our official builds except for Windows right now? -Ted _