I would like a value like "all" but which means "all the platforms on
which one of the tests I've listed runs". For example if I do "try: -p
new-value -u crashtest,reftest" I want to get all platforms that run
crashtests and/or reftests, so I can avoid say Armv7a ICS.
On 04/10/12 01:10, Ben Hearsum wrote:
I don't think anyone is saying that simply using try a lot is bad. But I
think it's valid to question the usage if someone is always using "-p
all". That's not to say it can't be valid/useful usage, just that it's
more questionable than other usage.
The w
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 06:40 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>>> http://people.mozilla.org/~catlee/highscores/highscores.html is a report of
>>> where our time on Try is going.
>>
>> I think we should hav
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:52:38PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> On 03.10.12 15:41, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> >>On 03.10.12 14:33, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> I've looked a bit deepe
On 03.10.12 15:41, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
On 03.10.12 14:33, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
I've looked a bit deeper into the code, and there's unused
functionality that I'd like to rip out
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> On 03.10.12 14:33, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> >>I've looked a bit deeper into the code, and there's unused
> >>functionality that I'd like to rip out of JarMaker.py in favor of
> >
On 03.10.12 14:33, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
I've looked a bit deeper into the code, and there's unused
functionality that I'd like to rip out of JarMaker.py in favor of
this:
Support for multiple jars in one go is one thing I'd love to axe.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Axel Hecht wrote:
> I've looked a bit deeper into the code, and there's unused
> functionality that I'd like to rip out of JarMaker.py in favor of
> this:
>
> Support for multiple jars in one go is one thing I'd love to axe.
> I've probably added that thin
On 10/03/12 07:33 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 06:40 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>>> http://people.mozilla.org/~catlee/highscores/highscores.html is a report of
>>> where our time on Try is going.
>>
>> I think we should have this data
I've looked a bit deeper into the code, and there's unused functionality
that I'd like to rip out of JarMaker.py in favor of this:
Support for multiple jars in one go is one thing I'd love to axe. I've
probably added that thinking we could one day just fire one jarmaker for
all of a language p
On 09/29/2012 06:40 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Chris AtLee wrote:
>> http://people.mozilla.org/~catlee/highscores/highscores.html is a report of
>> where our time on Try is going.
>
> I think we should have this data feed into a cronjob that emails the
> top ~5 week
Nathan Froyd wrote:
IMHO, the current state of affairs for bug 792169 is a little ugly, insofar as
you do:
#include "nsArray.h"
...
nsCOMPtr = nsArray::Create();
...
I can certainly see the advantages of
#include "nsIMutableArray.h"
...
nsCOMPtr array = NewIArray();
[I'm assuming here
12 matches
Mail list logo
