Re: try: -p all considered harmful?

2012-09-30 Thread Jeff Hammel
On 09/28/2012 10:12 PM, Chris Pearce wrote: On 29/09/12 14:32, L. David Baron wrote: On Friday 2012-09-28 22:16 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 9/28/12 10:03 PM, Seth Fowler wrote: On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: The point is that the patches that _do_ need to land urgently

No DOM Bindings Meeting Monday

2012-09-30 Thread Kyle Huey
Due to the MoCo meeting the DOM bindings meeting for 10/1 is canceled. - Kyle ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: New branches in the git mirror

2012-09-30 Thread Mike Ratcliffe
Thanks, that is excellent! How often are these updated. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

New branches in the git mirror

2012-09-30 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
As of a few minutes ago, I've added 4 new branches to the git mirror at https://github.com/mozilla/mozilla-central. The new branches are aurora, beta, release and esr10, and they track the corresponding Mercurial repositories. If you're using this mirror, here is a list of branches that you proba

Re: try: -p all considered harmful?

2012-09-30 Thread Justin Lebar
>> Much-to-most of this "B2G-only" code compiles on other platforms, too. >> Or at least, that is true of the B2G patches I've reviewed. We >> shouldn't exaggerate the effect of this without some data. (Note that >> basically any code we want to write unit tests for at the moment must >> compile

Re: try: -p all considered harmful?

2012-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Sunday 2012-09-30 02:47 -0400, Justin Lebar wrote: > >> Unfortunately, due to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767501, > >> the only way to get b2g builds on try is to use '-p all'. > > > > > > Sounds like that should be a P1 for reducing load then. > > Much-to-most of this "B2G-onl

Re: try: -p all considered harmful?

2012-09-30 Thread Justin Lebar
>> Also, I hope this manual override is not a pain to use. Pretty please? >> :) > > The hook attached to the bug requires that you include a short string token > in your commit message. The token is generated as a function of time, your > ldap name, and a local secret. Without specifying the token