Aggg! Grabbing a previous mail as a template I forgot to change
the subject - Sorry for the confusion.
See below
-- Forwarded message --
From: AllassoPraise
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:57:47 -0700
Subject: Re: Intent to require Python 3 to build Firefox 59 and later
To: dev-bu
Hello,
When trying to do non-archive build on Linux I get error:
29:57.52Compiling style v0.0.1
(file:///home/allasso/mozilla-central/mozilla-central_3/servo/components/style)
29:57.52 error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifier
This is after successfully running mach bootstrap.
Here is my con
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Kevin Jones
wrote:
> I have python2.7, python3.5, and python (which links to 2.7) on my linux
> machine. Will mach build sort this out and know which version to use for
> what?
>
That is the recommend binary naming convention for Python binaries. The
build syste
I have python2.7, python3.5, and python (which links to 2.7) on my
linux machine. Will mach build sort this out and know which version
to use for what?
Also, on OS X I only have 2.7, so I assume I'll have to install 3.x
using port. What variable do I need to set in my mozconfig to tell
mach bui
As long as we follow PEP 394, I'm super excited. (including on our
mozilla-build windows system, which counts as 'unix-like')
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM, David Burns wrote:
> I am not saying it should but if we have a requirement for python 3, we are
> also going to have a requirement for py
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> client.mk has existed since 1998 (https://hg.mozilla.org/
> experimental/mozilla-central-cvs/rev/0a5e1fa423bd). Before `mach`,
> client.mk was the recommended way to build Firefox and perform other
> build tasks. client.mk has rarely changed
There will come a point very soon when working on Python 2 code is
about as attractive as working on Perl (sorry, Perl afficionados!).
So this effort will get us to the point where heavily-developed things
run in Python 3, less-heavily-develped stuff is at least "ready to
port" (ensured via variou
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 12:12 PM, David Burns wrote:
>
> I am not saying it should but if we have a requirement for python 3, we
> are also going to have a requirement for py2 to both be available for local
> development.
>
>
> Correct, an
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 12:12 PM, David Burns wrote:
> I am not saying it should but if we have a requirement for python 3,
> we are also going to have a requirement for py2 to both be available
> for local development.
Correct, and as far as I know that's the plan of record. As Greg said,
we're n
9 matches
Mail list logo
