Add a PaddlePaddle frontend for TVM, also I have created [a RFC topic in
forum](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-add-a-paddlepaddle-frontend/10692)
where we can discuss at same time.
The related pull request is https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/8645, still lack
of UT, which will be finished
> @jiangjiajun Thanks for bringing this rfc, which will help TVM to serve more
> conveniently for paddlepaddle users. This rfc is good generally speaking.
> However, there are many spell grammar error so that I suggest you could do
> one round of proof-reading
Thanks for your comments, I'll rev
Thanks @will-jl944 for revising and polishing this document, it really helps me
a lot!
@FrozenGene And an example code is provided in `Guide-level explanation`,
could you review this RFC again, thanks~
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email d
> Two followup actionable items per
> https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs#rfc-workflow
>
> * Please rename the rfc to the original PR number (19)
> * Please create a tracking issue per guideline
Okay
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email direct
This issue will track the progress of PaddlePaddle frontend. Here is the RFC:
[Add PaddlePaddle
Frontend](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/add_paddlepaddle_frontend.md)
There're some works will be done for this frontend,
- [ ] Add a PaddlePaddle frontend supports most common op
This pull request rename rfc file `add_paddlepaddle_frontend.md` to
`0019-add-paddlepaddle-frontend.md`, and add a tracking issue link.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/20
-- Commit Summary --
* Merge pull request #3 fro
Hi, @junrushao1994
I think we could add paddlepaddle frontend as a new feature in the release note
of v0.8
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8976#issuecomment-955121366
Thanks @junrushao1994 !
There are 2 part I think we may need to fix
For the **Accepted RFCs** part,
> `[RFC-0019] Add paddlePaddle frontend`
it should be `[RFC-0019] Add PaddlePaddle frontend`, just a case problem
And for the **Frontends** part,
> **PaddlePaddle initial support #8645**
I ha
> > Should we wait for PyTorch TVM PR #8777? It should be merged soon.
>
> @masahi we can wait for it if this PR could get in this week
Does this mean we will update v0.8 branch again this week, I merged a new pull
request this week early https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9428 , will this be
+1
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9504#issuecomment-968217005
Hi Luis,
Both tests in
[https://github.com/vegaluisjose/vta-tsim-tests](https://github.com/vegaluisjose/vta-tsim-tests)
failed after updating TVM repo, please have a check.
Thanks.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/getting-started-with-the-vta-chisel-backend/2987/20)
to respon
Luis, thanks for pointing it out.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/getting-started-with-the-vta-chisel-backend/2987/22)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubsc
We here at [OctoML](https://octoml.ai) are thinking of hosting an online TVM
meetup to give people a way to connect while working from home and interact in
a higher bandwidth medium than here or Github issues. Following the [TVM
meeting guidelines](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/tvm-meetup-guideline
> However it is quite expensive in terms of logistics and organization
@ramana-arm, to keep this light weight, my thought was initially to:
1. Put up an agenda Google doc a few weeks before the scheduled day
2. Invite people to add topics to discuss (and/or volunteer to talk about
topics from
oogle.com/document/d/1bfE7Ydk43aMM3aiLf8GM7xEatPJwhj839ANfBheUJcM/edit?usp=sharing)
feel free to make comments and suggestions on the format and content or to
volunteer to present something. You can also comment here in this discuss
thread. Currently we have:
### Tentative (May 5th) agenda:
* 2 min - Introduction - Jason Knight
* 10 min
Edit: posting this reply separately for link snapshotting purposes:
@ramana-arm Great points and we will make sure that any discussion in an online
meetup is a complement, rather than a substitute for RFCs, Github issues, and
discuss threads.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/tv
h the agenda is:
* 2 min - Introduction - Jason Knight
* 10 min - Update on Unified IR work - Tianqi Chen
* 10 min - Graph pattern matching and rewriting - Matthew Brookhart
* 15 min - Ethos-N Integration using BYOC (Bring your own codegen) - Matthew
Barrett
* (Time available) -
* Ope
Thanks to @tqchen, @mbrookhart, and @matt-arm for the great talks and ~40 for
attending for a great first Online TVM Meetup!
Video is now up on Youtube [here](https://youtu.be/U_j1Yc-6sxM). And the agenda
is
[here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfE7Ydk43aMM3aiLf8GM7xEatPJwhj839ANfBheUJc
There was interest at the first TVM online meetup in scheduling an
embedded/bare metal focused session. Ideas of topics of discussion:
* Next planned steps following the [uTVM blog
post](https://tvm.apache.org/2020/06/04/tinyml-how-tvm-is-taming-tiny) work
from @areusch and @weberlo
* Use ca
> I wonder if via the fora here we should assemble a sort of mini list of
> protoRFCs in advance of the discussion.
Absolutely! Feel free to put them here or as suggested edits in [the agenda
doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfE7Ydk43aMM3aiLf8GM7xEatPJwhj839ANfBheUJcM/edit#).
---
Great suggestions, @liangfu would you be able to talk next week at one of the
slots above regarding your MISRA-C runtime work and plans?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/utvm-embedded-focus-online-meetup/6908/6) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing lis
Thanks everyone for the great feedback on here and the agenda. Please [register
for the event here ahead of
time](https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0pduyvrT4sGNFSF1LTMn9kW8S953ufskKR).
A recording will be uploaded to the OctoML Youtube channel immediately
afterwards as we did last ti
Also @liangfu Thanks for agreeing, I gave you a 15 minute slot on the agenda
(but we should be flexible for shorter or longer).
Here's the timezone conversions for next week if that helps people as well:
https://everytimezone.com/s
Thanks for the great meetup earlier today everyone. Video is up here:
https://youtu.be/mW7dk-rXuy8
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/utvm-embedded-focus-online-meetup/6908/12) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these em
:heart_eyes: :star_struck: Thank you for proposing this! Completely agreed that
we should disambiguate.
Having `tvm.script` and `te.hybrid.script` is an improvement, but I still think
there is far more overlap than ideal between the two.
What about `pytir`? Then it opens the door to other emb
When I read this RFC, I was confused because I read that the compilation flow
**currently** goes from
> TF/PyTorch/ONNX -> Relay -> TE (based on TE schedule) -> TIR -> C++/CUDA
And then I read:
> TensorIR is a brand new low-level IR with full scheduling support. Here are
> some [...]
And the
Fantastic! Thanks so much for stepping forward to lead something like this
@tgall_foo. I believe @hogepodge can give you access to add the uTVM meetup
calendar hit to the public TVM calendar.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/proposal-regular-tvm-meet-up/9863/4) to
respo
27 matches
Mail list logo
