[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-06-29 Thread Florin Blanaru
[Rendered](https://github.com/gigiblender/tvm-rfcs/blob/mangling-rfc/rfcs/0077_name_mangling_ir_modules.md) You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84 -- Commit Summary -- * [RFC] RFC-name-mangling-ir-modules -- File Changes --

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Add Target Features RFC (PR #78)

2022-06-29 Thread Christopher Sidebottom
> @Mousius added a question. would you like to discuss at a Community Meeting? Happy to do a quick update on where this went 😸 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/78#issuecomment-1170073609 You are receiving this because you are subscrib

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-06-29 Thread Tianqi Chen
Thanks @gigiblender ! a few points for consideration: - Ideally NameSupply should interact well with our current linkage spec, e.g. if a function have an attribute `global_symbol`, it means the name is "final"(because external users are expecting to look it up with that name), likely we need to

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)

2022-06-29 Thread Tianqi Chen
Thanks @Lunderberg for the update, I think we are moving towards positive direction of overall IR design. Some additional feedbacks: ## Keep Schedule Decisions Local to PrimFunc then Compose On schedule primitives, to be pragmatic, it would be helpful to have some of the cross PrimFunc re-flowi

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Encapsulate LLVM target for use with LLVM libraries (PR #83)

2022-06-29 Thread Tianqi Chen
cc @junrushao1994 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/83#issuecomment-1170296100 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: