Cross post from
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/2 for more
visibility.
>From @Johnson9009,
> Thanks for the work, for F4，do you mean we can write some impreative code
> that can be execute by Python?
Yes, that’s right. Actually you can write imperative code
That's a good idea. I cross posted the Q&A above to the RFC PR.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/5)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://disc
> what functionality does JSON provide that TVMScript doesn't do right now as
> it's designed? Is there a reason to have two formats to begin with? imo it is
> not worth having two formats here unless there's a clear need for structural
> analysis of TIR outside of TVM.
A good analog is the Pro
Please join us to welcome @denise-k as a new reviewer to TVM.
Denise is the main (co)authors of roadmap RFC and roadmap process:
- https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/31
- https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/50
- https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pre-rfc-tvm-roadmap/11171
And she helps t
