@driazati @leandron ,
I think this proposal will benefit all the work that require updates to
dependencies.
@masahi @Leo-arm @elenkalda-arm
I would suggest lets scope scripts that is relevant to this proposal (as it
seems there are already other places the attackers could exploit anyway) .
Hi all,
The vote result is +16:
+1: 16 votes (5 binding)
0: no votes
-1: no votes
Therefore the resolution is accepted and the RFC will be merged.
Thanks!
Andrew
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#issuecomment-1064303079
You are rec
Closed #10471.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#event-6219441981
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
[quote="manupa-arm, post:5, topic:12047"]
I am not sure I follow this proposal. Can you elaborate ?
[/quote]
It's mostly that we trust all code running on a branch but not necessarily code
running from PRs from forks, same as how Jenkins treats the `Jenkinsfile`
today. After thinking about thi
PR in TVM-RFC:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-uma-universal-modular-accelerator-interface/12039/16)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here]
Closed #38.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38#event-6221275454
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Closing as obsolete, since most of this is either already done or has been
subsumed by the Collage proposal.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/38#issuecomment-1064590913
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
I have some additional comments though I don't work on TVM/Relay; I just helped
Steven out with some parts of the fuzzer.
[quote="slyubomirsky, post:1, topic:12234"]
Fuzzing infrastructure poses the most questions: Should it be defined within
TVM’s codebase, or live separately? Where should th
