Expecting the new release!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8976#issuecomment-917922534
> Agree with @leandron that we could firstly refer to the items there. Many
> "initial" features in v0.7 are now stable. For example:
>
> * Initial automatic scheduling support -> stable.
>
> * Initial command line driver interface -> stable.
>
> * Intial Hexagon support -> stable.
@hogepodge @tqchen thanks for your advices. I have updated the PR.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-917983427
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:20 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > > For userspace components as well these communities of experts need to
> > > exist for each domain, and we need to en
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > For userspace components as well these communities of experts need to
> > exist for each domain, and we need to encourage upstream first
> > processes across the board for these split
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 15:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:51 AM Linus Walleij <
> linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dave Airlie
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For userspace components as well these communities of experts
> > > need to exist for
Thanks everyone who voted.
We have 21 +1s, no 0 and no -1s
The vote is passed.
Voting thread :
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra8edb5d192bed8bec49ae93a4a7f441b5ccc87e75144ceb6ded3ea97%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply
Closed #8928.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8928#event-5295424240
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8997
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8928#issuecomment-918561643
Hi, could the following RFC be reviewed please?
It is about extending the current metadata associated with project options
returned by the Project API.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Gustavo
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/33
-- Co
cc @areusch @manupa-arm
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/33#issuecomment-918581638
>n Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:54 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > One straightforward hardware independent low-level API would
> > be the traditional BLAS GEMM call[1] for matrix multiplication
> > and its variants (integer, float, bfloat16, ...). Most of the frameworks
> > are able to use SGEMM to do th
It seems that we all reach consensus and no more comments are raised for
several days, let's get this RFC finally merged! 🔥 🎉
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/25#issuecomment-918661725
Merged #25 into main.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/25#event-5296055520
14 matches
Mail list logo
