@FrozenGene Sorry, my description is ambiguous. You can compile a CoreML
model with the following command:
$(xcode-select -p)/usr/bin/coremlc compile [model.mlmodel] [outputFolder]
or
xcrun coremlcompiler compile [model.mlmodel] [outputFolder]
I tried Xcode 11.4 and 10.3, and I cou
[quote="kazum, post:3, topic:6309"]
$(xcode-select -p)/usr/bin/coremlc
[/quote]
XCode 10.1 works. (Post must be 20 characters)
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-coreml-runtime/6309/4) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe fro
In my time using TVM to do various research projects, I found the thing I
wanted most of all was a model zoo -- pretrained models already pulled in to
Relay/TVM. `tvm.relay.testing.*` was a great starting place for me, but I'd
love to see (1) pretrained weights included, (2) a greater variety
Due to recent situation, we might expect a bit of delay in the release to
June/July. We will do our best to keep the timeframe.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4
Indeed, having a coreml runtime support would be quite interesting for our iOS
backend
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-coreml-runtime/6309/5) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://di
Please join us to welcome @mbaret as a new reviewer to TVM. He contributes to
the areas of the ARM GPUs and custom graph partitioning and high level graph
optimization.
- [Commits
History](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/commits?author=mbaret)
- [Code
Review](https://github.com/apache/
Let's also attach the task items in this thread :slight_smile:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5318
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/allow-non-nullable-object-and-introduce-optional-t/6337/6)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mo
Is it going to be compatible with `std::optional` from C++17? It would be nice
to just switch to the `std` version, once we start using C++17.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/allow-non-nullable-object-and-introduce-optional-t/6337/7)
to respond.
You are receiving this because
So far it is specially designed for ObjectRef types, so that we can use nullptr
to store the not an option.
The advantage is that the `Optional` is essentially `T` during runtime and
won't incur additional storage cost. It is more like a better typing protection
in the C++ rather than creati
Merged #5322 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5322#event-3228861785
10 matches
Mail list logo
