Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] Add AVX512VNNI support for TVM (#3388)

2019-06-27 Thread Tianqi Chen
Because we need the test case to work for all environments, please add a feature detection step to skip the test if VNNI is not yet available. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [Relay][RFC] Garbage Collection (#3423)

2019-06-27 Thread hlu1
@MarisaKirisame, https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3448 was the leak @ajtulloch was referring to. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/3423#issuecomment-506540526

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Codegen] Broadcast ops with symbolic shape (#3390)

2019-06-27 Thread Yizhi Liu
Regarding how it would affect topi implementation of broadcast and reduce ops, I think we can migrate current compute implement to this new approach, while we might still need to know the shape beforehand in schedule. I'll change the name to "auto_broadcast" and document the behavior more preci

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][Codegen] Broadcast ops with symbolic shape (#3390)

2019-06-27 Thread Junru Shao
I am in favor of migrating as well :-) Ping @were again for another round of review. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/3390#issuecomment-506610158