That's a good idea. I cross posted the Q&A above to the RFC PR.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/5)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://disc
How about we consolidate our discussion to the RFC thread
(https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79) so that people can see what's
happening in a centralized place?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/4)
to respond.
You are receiving
Yes, that's right. Actually you can write imperative code to construct IR graph
now, by calling IR node constructors from `tvm.tir.stmt|expr` manually. The new
things behind F4 are:
1. IRBuilder API, which can be used to construct IR nodes in a more concise way
compared to calling node constru
Thanks for the work, for F4，do you mean we can write some impreative code that
can be execute by Python?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe fro
Hi all, we sent out an RFC for TVMScript Metaprogramming at
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79. Below is a section quoted from the
RFC for better visibility, describing what metaprogramming features we want to
support in this RFC. Would love to hear about your thoughts and feedback!
[
