Hi @gussmith23:
I just start playing with TVM this year. I'd think this is very useful to me.
>I'm posting this in advance of the TVM conference this year, as I'm doing a
>lighting talk on program analysis in Relay and am hoping that the talk
>generates some discussion.
Do you keep the link?
Hi:
I am wondering if there is any update on this proposal (after IR unified)?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/4468#issuecomment-855578430
+1
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/7991#issuecomment-833986813
@tqchen @tkonolige Here is the RFC created for discussion.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pass-instrument-framework-proposal/9874/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discu
# [IR][Pass][Instrument] Pass Instrument Framework
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7952
Proposal
===
Currently in TVM, there are trace mechanisms and passes time profiling.
* ### Trace
```cpp
/*!
* \brief PassContextNode contains the information that a pass can rely on,
* such as a
