Thank you very much for your efforts in this regard.and im looking forward to
it. Thanks again！
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/whether-tvm-will-support-dynamic-shapes-in-the-future/3700/6)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscri
Can anyone answer that? Thanks very much.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/whether-tvm-will-support-dynamic-shapes-in-the-future/3700/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm
I would like to know whether dynamic shapes are already supported in a
planned way. I am not familiar with other deep learning frameworks, but without
dynamic shapes, many OP of TF cannot be added, which leads to TVM's narrow
choice of models and lack of generality.
I seem to see some dyn
Maybe you can replace “nnvm” with “relay”
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/nnvm-compiler-doesnt-support-tensors-crashes-with-attributeerror-tensor-object-has-no-attribute-node/3321/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from
I have my doubts about the development of TVM
Q1: the support degree of TVM for operators, such as AddN, TensorArrayV3 and
so on. Since the above operators are not supported, TVM cannot support
fastRCNN, SSD and other models. But these models are very general and common.
Q2: according to the
I have the same problem. Can it be solved now?
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/how-to-support-tf-tensorarray/1983/2) to
respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscrib
