Please join us to welcome @Lunderberg as a new committer to TVM.
Eric has greatly contributed to the testing framework and CI, TIR buffer
allocation, and Vulkan backend etc. He has also been actively participating the
RFC and forum discussions around the related areas, where he has shared many
Yeah, there are different uses of context in the codebase. Device makes more
sense to me as well. Would the change to DLPack break other projects that take
it as a submodule?
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-rename-tvmcontext-to-tvmdevice/9090/7)
to respond.
You ar
It is really nice to add the regression tests against a selected set of models,
since the down streams users usually have to spend quite amount of time to find
the root cause once there is a regression. Or they have to sync the upstream
codebase as frequent as possible and test regression loca
This looks okay to me. But I have one comment because this sounds like we need
to add one more argument to the build interface which users may not need to
know the details. Another possible option is that we can bake it into
`PassContext` as a config. However, I understand that this configure
Please join us to welcome Junru Shao(@junrushao1994) as a new Committer. Junru
has been actively contributing to various aspects of the TVM codebase. He
reimplemented and refactored the Target system which greatly helped code
lowering and code generation. Junru also largely contributed to the
Yeah, this could be a useful tool to generate the generic templates or the code
with the fixed pattern which is actually the major part of a node. For some
other members, e.g. SEqualReduce and SHashReduce, we may still need users to
manually check/add since they are not always `Equal(this->a,
