Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM v0.10.0.rc0 (Issue #13026)

+1 great work @AndrewZhaoLuo -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/13026#issuecomment-1274228792 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Commit Messages RFC (Issue #12583)

+1 (binding) Thierry > On Aug 24, 2022, at 5:55 PM, Leandro Nunes ***@***.***> wrote: > > > +1 > > Disclaimer: I’m a co-author of the original RFC > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > , or > unsubscrib

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Quarterly Releases RFC (Issue #11415)

+1 (Binding) > On May 23, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Andrew Reusch > wrote: > > This is a formal vote thread to determine committer and PMC support for > [Quarterly Releases RFC](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/67). > Replying +1 here means you support the RFC and we should merge it. This vot

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Inclusive Language RFC (#68) (PR #68)

+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/68#issuecomment-1121104485 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation (Issue #10471)

+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#issuecomment-1058495116 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm-vta] Port to new Chisel stable release (3.5) (PR #37)

Merged #37 into main. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-vta/pull/37#event-5966816624 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [RFC] Support Codegen Using Texture Memory (#2250)

Good idea, thank you @masahi ! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/2250#issuecomment-1009385967 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [RFC] Support Codegen Using Texture Memory (#2250)

Technically it hasn't been merged in but it's worth pointing to the RFCs and PRs for posterity @masahi: See [this RFC](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-texture-memory-support/9467) to understand the broader contributions of the texture enablement work. There are several PRs that need to la

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM v0.8.0.rc0 (Issue #9504)

+1 > On Nov 15, 2021, at 11:35 AM, Chris Sullivan > wrote: > > +1 > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9504#issuecomment-969249736 --

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][TIR] Separate physical and logical layout of buffers (#39)

@vinx13 @junrushao1994 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/39#issuecomment-935140712

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][TIR] Separate physical and logical layout of buffers (#39)

CC @kparzysz-quic @manupa-arm -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/39#issuecomment-935138066

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Adopt round-robin assignment of reviewers for GitHub pull request reviewer assignment. (#9057)

It's worth giving this a try! +1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-924558815

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Adopt New Code Review Guideline (#8928)

+1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8928#issuecomment-912857109

Re: [apache/tvm-vta] Fix simulation for new chisel release (#34)

Merged #34 into main. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-vta/pull/34#event-5191584245

Re: [apache/tvm-vta] Port to the latest stable Chisel release (#33)

Merged #33 into main. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-vta/pull/33#event-5184321050

Re: [apache/tvm-vta] Port to the latest stable Chisel release (#33)

@vegaluisjose @liangfu can you take a look? thanks! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-vta/pull/33#issuecomment-902230052

Re: [apache/tvm-vta] Port to the latest stable Chisel release (#33)

Thank you @ekiwi - glad to see your changes use the latest stable release. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-vta/pull/33#issuecomment-902229418

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Automatic Mixed Precision Pass RFC (#6)

CCing @csullivan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/6#issuecomment-857933603

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Adopt the New RFC Process (#7991)

+1 Thierry > On May 10, 2021, at 3:15 PM, Xiyou Zhou > wrote: > > > +1 > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/7991#issuecomment-837422559 ---

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.7.0.rc0 (#6622)

+1 (binding): -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6622#issuecomment-703874194

Re: Test to see if podling is listening

Ack > On Aug 27, 2020, at 4:36 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > > Ack > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:09 PM Tianqi Chen > wrote: > >> Ack:) >> >> TQ >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: >> >>> Ack. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >>> This is

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Apache TVM Graduation (#6332)

+1 (binding) -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/6332#issuecomment-679378081

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [DISCUSS][RFC] Apache TVM Graduation (#6299)

+1 Apache TVM graduation will be a huge milestone. It’s already been a very vibrant community. > On Aug 18, 2020, at 11:03 PM, Siju Samuel wrote: > > +1 > TVM community progress is very good and its ready for graduation. Looking > forward to this. > > -- > You are receiving this because you

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.1.rc1 (#5947)

+1 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5947#issuecomment-651301091

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.1.rc0 (#5939)

+1 Thierry > On Jun 26, 2020, at 6:16 PM, masahi wrote: > > +1 > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5939#issuecomment-650468556 ---

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [COMMUNITY] @masahi -> PPMC (#5691)

Merged #5691 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5691#event-3387955841

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [COMMUNITY] @zhiics -> PPMC (#5692)

Merged #5692 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/5692#event-3387953901

[apache/incubator-tvm] [COMMUNITY] @liangfu -> committer (#5460)

Please join us to welcome @liangfu as a committer. He has helped maintain much of the Chisel codebase for VTA and notably has brought support to Intel FPGAs. More recently he contributed by adding a MISRA-C compliant lightweight runtime for micro-controllers. He also built early support for spar

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] VTA HW/SW refactor (#5102)

I'm glad to announce the results of the vote on VTA HW/SW refactor. This vote passes with 11 +1 votes, no 0 votes, and 0 -1 vote. +1 votes Tianqi Chen Jared Roesch Luis Vega Krzysztof Parzyszek Haichen Shen Pasquale Cocchini Kazutaka Morita Liangfu Chen Neo Ch

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] VTA HW/SW refactor (#5102)

Closed #5102. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5102#event-3170066386

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] VTA HW/SW refactor (#5102)

Thanks for everyone that voted closing the vote now. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5102#issuecomment-604683379

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] VTA HW/SW refactor (#5102)

@huajsj @liangfu @pasqoc @vegaluisjose -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/5102#issuecomment-601365995

[apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] VTA HW/SW refactor (#5102)

It's been great to see growth in the TVM community contributing to VTA in the recent years. VTA is TVM's open source hardware accelerator stack, and consists of multiple components bridging hardware and software design, including RTL sources in Chisel and HLS, driver libraries, simulation librar

[apache/incubator-tvm] [COMMUNITY] @huajsj -> Reviewer (#4993)

Congratulations to @huajsj for joining TVM's list of reviewers. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4993 -- Commit Summary -- * Adding Hua Jiang as reviewer. -- File Changes -- M CONTRIBUTORS.md (1) -- Patch Lin

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [NNVM][RFC] Begin the removal of NNVM. (#4496)

VTA's dependence on NNVM (#4419) has mostly been removed; documentation and CI dockerfiles have to be updated to reflect this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/44

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.0.rc2 (#4443)

+1 Thierry > On Nov 30, 2019, at 9:22 AM, Wuwei Lin wrote: > > +1 > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4443#issuecomment-55239

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [Release] Add cma as a submodule (#4434)

@liangfu there is a CI error related to the new submodule, can you take a look? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4434#issuecomment-558953029

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Support for Sparse Computation (#4332)

Those are all great questions @liangfu. Question 3 is an interesting one w.r.t to what kinds of scheduling primitives we'll need for sparse operators. One easy workaround is to apply vectorization along a dense tensor dimension if there is one. For many practical examples, tensors won't be spa

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

@u99127 do you lean more towards storing the list of measurements (e.g. over 10 runs) and letting the user implement their aggregation function? Or list multiple ones? Or just agree to standardize towards one (e.g. mean). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Repl

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

That's a sound argument; we should keep runtime config for the `num_cpu_threads` then to store information on non-hardware, and non-software metadata -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

@tqchen `docker_tag` is under metadata; therefore it's mostly seen as optional (and is here for example purposes) Indeed `num_cpu_threads` is a tricky one and I thought long and hard about this; it makes sense not to place it under `software_config`, and instead could be considered a `hardware`

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

Other than that looks great 👍 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4304#issuecomment-557640388

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

And if possible the addition of an `md5` field under `workload_metadata` to attest the integrity of the model. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/issues/4304#issuecomment-

Re: [apache/incubator-tvm] [RFC] Benchmark Performance Log Format WIP (#4304)

@anwang2009 I'd like to suggest one last modification: the removal of the `runtime_config` since many of the fields overlap with the `software_config`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apac

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [VOTE] Add "Organizations contributing using and contributing to TVM" Section to Community Webpage (#4162)

+1 > On Oct 21, 2019, at 12:07 AM, Tianqi Chen wrote: > > It has been great to see community growth over the past few years. One thing > that was bought up by several community members recently was should we show > organization logos that use and contribute to TVM. > > This is an RFC thread t

[dmlc/tvm] [COMMUNITY] soiferj -> reviewer (#4108)

Please join me in welcoming @soiferj as a new reviewer of the Apache TVM project. Jon has extended TOPI with new operators, extended coverage of ONNX and TensorFlow Relay frontends, added IR passes to combine dense ops in parallel among other contributions. - [Commits](https://github.com/dmlc/

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] Tensor Core Support (#4052)

Very welcome work @Hzfengsy ! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/4052#issuecomment-537791018

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [Relay][RFC] Relay support for Sparse Tensor (#3731)

@ZihengJiang @tqchen @jroesch @MarisaKirisame @yidawang @zheng-da @ajtulloch -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/3731#issuecomment-519361871

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [Community] slyubomirsky -> Reviewer (#3673)

Merged #3673 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3673#event-2521691321

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] [Contrib] [Runtime] Minimal runtime (~12kb .text on ARMv7/x86) for subset of TVM models (#3567)

+ 1 on getting this integrated with uTVM. @weberlo, care to take a look at this PR and make some high-level comments? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3567#issuecomment-5126845

[dmlc/tvm] [Community] Zhi Chen -> Committer (#3572)

Let's welcome Zhi as a new Apache TVM Committer! You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3572 -- Commit Summary -- * [Community] Zhi Chen -> Committer -- File Changes -- M CONTRIBUTORS.md (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.c

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [Relay][RFC] Implement type checking for Any (#3221)

Merged #3221 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3221#event-2473299812

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] [VTA] [TSIM] Enabling Cycle-Accurate Hardware Simulation for VTA #3009 (#3010)

Merged #3010 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3010#event-2327864904

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] [VTA] [TSIM] Enabling Cycle-Accurate Hardware Simulation for VTA #3009 (#3010)

I've approved the changes @vegaluisjose @tqchen. There seems to be an issue with the pr-merge CI; perhaps the branch should be re-based? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/pull/3010#i

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] [VTA] [TSIM] Enabling Cycle-Accurate Hardware Simulation for VTA #3009 (#3010)

In order not to confuse adopters of TSIM, who would like to use TSIM to simulate any hardware instead of VTA itself, can we have a guide that is not part of the `install.md` file aimed at VTA developers? Once VTA can be simulated by TSIM we can merge it back. -- You are receiving this because

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC] [VTA] [TSIM] Enabling Cycle-Accurate Hardware Simulation for VTA (#3009)

This will facilitate continuous testing of novel VTA features, and invite more contribution to modify the VTA spec in the future. Cycle-accurate testing from high-level test scripts in Python is definitely the way forward for all of TVM's backend. @kazum @ktabata it would be great to get your t

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [Vote] Deprecate Python2 Support (#2994)

+1 > On Apr 9, 2019, at 10:14 AM, Nick Hynes wrote: > > Ah finally! So much +1 > > — > You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > , or mute the > threa

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [VOTE] Apache Transition Plan (#2973)

+1 > On Apr 5, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Tianqi Chen wrote: > > TVM has been transitioned to Apache, following our traditional as well as > Apache’s, major decisions about community will result in a VOTE. Everyone in > the community is welcomed to participate. This is the first voting thread > after

Re: [dmlc/tvm] [RFC][AUTOTVM] Auto-Schedule from Compute Declaration (#2954)

Thanks @merrymercy, this is really awesome work. I second Jared's comment on work involved in adding a backend. I'd be happy to chat some more about how one would add automated compilation to different hardware accelerators including VTA. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to