Re: [apache/tvm] [pre-RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #9730)

2022-01-18 Thread Senad Durakovic
@areusch @jroesch Is there some aging process to follow in the TVM Open Source so issues get looked at and advanced without getting stale for weeks? As there are timelines that get affected by such delays. Thanks -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #48)

2022-01-18 Thread Senad Durakovic
@areusch @jroesch Is there some aging process to follow in the TVM Open Source so issues get looked at and advanced without getting stale for weeks? As there are timelines that get affected by such delays. Thanks -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache

Re: [apache/tvm] [pre-RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #9730)

2022-01-11 Thread Senad Durakovic
Hello @jroesch , Trying to refresh this pre-RFC as it seems to have become dormant (perhaps due to Holidays). Would appreciate your help as it seems to be blocked by rust/cargo related issues that we are not familiar with. Related RFC is "https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/48"; Thank you!

Re: [apache/tvm] [pre-RFC][BYOC] Marvell ML/AI Accelerator Integration (PR #9730)

2021-12-15 Thread Senad Durakovic
Wondering if someone can help out provide some insights and pointers related to the failing "rust" tests. In addition, there is quite a bit of "noise" with the cudart cluttering useful messages, so would appreciate if that can be suppressed/filtered out. - Thank you 2021-12-15 18:46:35.799320: