PR in TVM-RFC:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/60
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-uma-universal-modular-accelerator-interface/12039/16)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here]
Thanks everyone for the detailed input and feedback!
To keep track of the **latest version** of the UMA pre-RFC and to add the
**great suggestions that we got from this discussion thread**, I created a
document in our tvm-rfc fork :
https://github.com/boschresearch/tvm-rfcs/blob/rfc_uma/rfcs/0
Hi Andrew.
:+1: Sounds good!
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/unifying-tvm-and-microtvm-community-meetings/12171/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/
Hi Chris,
is there a plan when the next TVM Community Meeting is going to take place?
Especially the "Remove CODEOWNERS" discussion seems to be a good fit for a
high-bandwidth discussion:
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/8
Thanks,
Michael
CC: @hogepodge @aca8
@fPecc, Andrew @areusch has agreed to put it on the agenda of the next
community meeting. Would be great to have as many interested community members
there as possible to collect requirements and find a sweet spot for the API 👍.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-uma-
Andrew, thanks for the summary :) .
Thanks everyone for the great discussion @cgerum @paulpb
@philippvk @r.stahl @areusch @jroesch @mbs-octoml!
[quote="areusch, post:6, topic:12039"]
Partitioning: UMA is using the standard TVM partitioner, registering patterns
using the pattern-table infras
Thanks @areusch and @jroesch for the input and great questions on this PRE-RFC
👍.
We really appreciate it. As this is a pre-RFC, we felt it is really important
to get input from the TVM community as soon as possible :) .
[quote="jroesch, post:2, topic:12039"]
There has been talking of unifyin
