CCing some folks who might be interested @areusch @ziheng
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-improvements-to-automatic-quantization-for-bare-metal/7108/4)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here]
I agree with @matt-arm that we should be hesitant to use BYOC as a catch-all
for everything we haven't implemented in TVM.
What would help me better understand the motivation for this change is an
example of a quantization flow that isn't easily expressible with TVM's
*internal* facilities.
@cbalint13 Ahh. My branch is trailing behind `master` a bit, so I missed this.
Thanks for the heads up!
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-improvements-to-automatic-quantization-for-bare-metal/7108/3)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
For bare-metal devices, it is desirable (for both space and performance
reasons) to have a network that consists entirely of integral data types (most
often `int8`). However, the automatic integer quantization mechanism in Relay
does not serve this use case for two reasons:
1) Inputs are assu
