Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Transition Main to Unity (Issue #16368)

2024-01-08 Thread Lite Ye
+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/16368#issuecomment-1881983234 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming (PR #79)

2022-07-13 Thread Lite Ye
@xqdan Thanks! For your questions, > For compute fusion. With TE compute, it's easy to concate TE computes with > producer-comsuer relation to get a fused compute. for example, conv + > elemwise ops fusion. We should have similar function in TVM script. Which > thread is related to this require

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming (PR #79)

2022-07-07 Thread Lite Ye
Thanks @tkonolige and @areusch for the valuable feedback! They are very helpful on getting me to better clarify the motivation behind this work and also the design detail. I updated the RFC to address them. Please take another look and let me know if you have more questions. -- Reply to this

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TUNIP: TVMScript Unified Printer (PR #74)

2022-06-18 Thread Lite Ye
> what functionality does JSON provide that TVMScript doesn't do right now as > it's designed? Is there a reason to have two formats to begin with? imo it is > not worth having two formats here unless there's a clear need for structural > analysis of TIR outside of TVM. A good analog is the Pro

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming

2022-06-18 Thread Lite Ye via Apache TVM Discuss
That's a good idea. I cross posted the Q&A above to the RFC PR. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://disc

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming (PR #79)

2022-06-18 Thread Lite Ye
Cross post from https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-tvmscript-metaprogramming/12969/2 for more visibility. >From @Johnson9009, > Thanks for the work, for F4,do you mean we can write some impreative code > that can be execute by Python? Yes, that’s right. Actually you can write imperative code

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming

2022-06-17 Thread Lite Ye via Apache TVM Discuss
Yes, that's right. Actually you can write imperative code to construct IR graph now, by calling IR node constructors from `tvm.tir.stmt|expr` manually. The new things behind F4 are: 1. IRBuilder API, which can be used to construct IR nodes in a more concise way compared to calling node constru

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming

2022-06-16 Thread Lite Ye via Apache TVM Discuss
Hi all, we sent out an RFC for TVMScript Metaprogramming at https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79. Below is a section quoted from the RFC for better visibility, describing what metaprogramming features we want to support in this RFC. Would love to hear about your thoughts and feedback! [

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Add TVMScript Metaprogramming RFC (PR #79)

2022-06-16 Thread Lite Ye
[Rendered](https://github.com/yelite/tvm-rfcs/blob/tvmscript-metaprogramming/rfcs/0079-tvmscript-metaprogramming.md) You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/79 -- Commit Summary -- * Add TVMScript Metaprogramming RFC -- File Ch

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TUNIP: TVMScript Unified Printer (PR #74)

2022-05-25 Thread Lite Ye
[Rendered](https://github.com/yelite/tvm-rfcs/blob/tunip/rfcs/0074-tvmscript-unified-printer.md) You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/74 -- Commit Summary -- * Add tunip RFC * Add co-authors -- File Changes -- A rfcs/