## Motivation
Currently, TVM lacks an up-to-date and reproducible benchmark. The only
benchmark is hosted at
[tvm/apps/benchmark](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/tree/main/apps/benchmark).
However, this benchmark is too old and has several flaws.
1. The results were obtained 2 years ag
@jcf94 @junrushao1994 Sorry, both of you don't understand my question correctly.
I mean the original TE is a declarative language so it can know all
transformation before it starts to generate low-level AST. But the new schedule
primitives are done imperatively. In the original TE, we can shar
How is the compilation speed compared to the original TE?
In Ansor/Autotvm, we have to compile a lot of schedules for feature extraction,
so the speed of schedule transformation matters.
Do you have any benchmark results? Intuitively, I think the original TE will be
faster because it can do a
