Re: [apache/tvm] [ci][docker] Use RFC image tags only (PR #11938)

2022-07-26 Thread Florin Blanaru
Thanks @driazati! LGTM! @areusch -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11938#issuecomment-1195513761 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[apache/tvm] [RFC][Tracking Issue] Name mangling in IRModules (Issue #12181)

2022-07-25 Thread Florin Blanaru
This issue is to track progress for `Name mangling in IRModules` PR: #12066 RFC discussion: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84 Forum: https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pre-rfc-name-mangling-in-irmodules/12944/7 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apac

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-07-24 Thread Florin Blanaru
> @gigiblender is this ready for a last review? @areusch yes -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84#issuecomment-1193604132 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [ci][docker] Use RFC image tags only (PR #11938)

2022-07-24 Thread Florin Blanaru
> @gigiblender could you review this one so you can understand how this tool > works? @areusch Sure -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/11938#issuecomment-1193596507 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message I

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-07-12 Thread Florin Blanaru
Adding a [draft PR](https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12066) to this discussion. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84#issuecomment-1181766176 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-07-04 Thread Florin Blanaru
> A couple of thoughts... > > * We should have a common facility that represents a scope in which names > need to be unique. Conceptually it could be a set of "known" strings (that > are presumed used), and something (like a private counter) to generate a > unique suffix. The use would be

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-06-30 Thread Florin Blanaru
> Thanks @gigiblender ! a few points for consideration: > > * Ideally NameSupply should interact well with our current linkage spec, > e.g. if a function have an attribute `global_symbol`, it means the name is > "final"(because external users are expecting to look it up with that name), > l

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84)

2022-06-29 Thread Florin Blanaru
[Rendered](https://github.com/gigiblender/tvm-rfcs/blob/mangling-rfc/rfcs/0077_name_mangling_ir_modules.md) You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/84 -- Commit Summary -- * [RFC] RFC-name-mangling-ir-modules -- File Changes --