Great, thank you!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/108#issuecomment-2102803235
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Leaving it open for another week in case others want to chime in, otherwise LGTM
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/108#issuecomment-2102706022
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Thanks for the info about the schedules and differences, it makes sense.
As for moving on, what would be the next step now? Do you need any other info
from us for reviewing?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/108#issuecomment-2102668139
I think the main reason here was relay default incorporate autotuning by
default, while Relax dos not. The main rationale as of now is we would like to
choose to decouple metaschedule tuning from the flow (as tuning is usually
slower).
That does not mean metaschedule cannot be applied, we do
