I think it is helpful to add a discussion about how the flow would fit into the
DLight usecases. I don't think it would likely cause too much of an overhead :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/107#issuecomment-1991996163
You are recei
Thanks @tqchen, at the moment the Relax flow would be out of scope for our
current use-cases, although we'd want to make sure this RFC doesn't introduce
obstacles for porting to the Relax flow in the future. Do you foresee any
blockers with the current approach, or could we consider merging?
--
Thanks @lhutton1 , for relax and moving forward, one canonical example that can
be helpful is the
[https://github.com/apache/tvm/tree/main/python/tvm/dlight](dlight) package,
which defines pattern matching and apply of transforms, that can then be used
as part of pass.
Right now dlight starte
Thanks for the discussion so far @tqchen, I added a small example detailing how
we're registering schedules for the Relay flow. I believe this will have
minimal impact for how the schedule might be used in a Relax based flow, but it
would be good to hear your thoughts.
--
Reply to this email d
