Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Scalable vectors in TIR (PR #104)

2023-08-24 Thread Tianqi Chen
Some quick comments - I think we should use tir intrinsics(as opposed to a new node, which would add extra burdens in the IR) - In general, it might be useful to know the information that a value is multiple of something (e.g. 128), so having something like `x * 128` might help - I would still

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Scalable vectors in TIR (PR #104)

2023-08-24 Thread Elen Kalda
Tagging some people who have been involved in related discussions before: @tqchen @kparzysz-quic @masahi -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/104#issuecomment-1692114269 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. M

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Scalable vectors in TIR (PR #104)

2023-08-24 Thread Elen Kalda
This RFC is to add support for vector length agnostic programming in TVM stack. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/104 -- Commit Summary -- * [RFC] Scalable vectors in TIR -- File Changes -- A rfcs/0104-scalable-vecto