Thank you so much @tqchen @slyubomirsky @sanirudh for your detailed inputs on
this!
I have some thoughts and questions listed below. I also discussed them with
@sanirudh. It would be great if we can address them in the next unity meeting.
I'll add this topic to the agenda.
1. Axis separator
Dear Community:
As we all have witnessed in the past half year. The world of AI/ML is evolving
rapidly, with the arrival of foundational models: stable diffusion for image
generation, whisper for voice recognition, GPT and open LLMs(llama, vicuna,
MPT, RedPajama, Falcon).
These pipelines enc
for the static memory planning, i think it is not a big issue, since that can
happens after we do `FlattenLowAxisSepDimensions `, so memory planner will be
able to capture the n-D needs
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/axis-separator-in-relax-tensor/15385/7)
to respond.
Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation @tqchen and @slyubomirsky
I understand the concern about modifying the StructInfo. My only thought was to
store the logical to physical memory mapping somewhere in Relax, so that when
we do static memory planning, we don't just assume 1d allocation, bu
Just another update and gentle reminder, it is great to see unity being
developed and used for dynamic shape and emerging usecases
One goal of the G1 is to give some time answer question. There are more topics
of related interest(some might related to the questions in this thread
https://discus
I have Updated Github pre_release to release and also upload to the svn release
folder
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/15134#issuecomment-1651578205
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
> Hi all, vote passes with #14844, next we'll [upload the binaries to Apache
> mirrors and create a new release
> TAG](https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/release_process.html#post-the-release)
> named v0.13.0 meanwhile remove the pre-release candidate TAG v0.13.0.rc0.
> This program needs h
