Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][Backend] RFC-CSI-NN2-Integration (PR #75)

2022-06-12 Thread alter-xp
@areusch Thanks a lot. let me update the image. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/75#issuecomment-1153408149 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)

2022-06-12 Thread Chris Sullivan
Thanks for sharing the contextual pointers for the community @vinx13. Agreed the approaches discussed are both valid. I would actually like to argue the stronger point that they are complimentary and are only appearing to be contrary because we are considering too narrow of a scope. It can be

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TUNIP: TVMScript Unified Printer (PR #74)

2022-06-12 Thread Junru Shao
To summarize offline discussion with @areusch: Q: Is this going to unify current fragmented printing formats? A: Yes for TIR. After following the standard deprecation procedure (see Section "Upgrade Plan"), TVMScript will be the only frontend (i.e. user-facing printer/parsing) for TIR, while the