[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC][Relay][Topi] Hashtable support

2022-06-07 Thread hgong via Apache TVM Discuss
I encountered similar issue with HashTable for TensorFlow : `NotImplementedError: The following operators are not implemented: {'DivNoNan', 'LookupTableImportV2', 'HashTableV2', 'AsString', 'StringToHashBucketFast', 'LookupTableFindV2', 'LookupTableSizeV2'}` and then noticed this RFC discuss

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Introducing DeclBuffer (PR #70)

2022-06-07 Thread Wuwei Lin
Seems we all agree that introducing `DeclBuffer` is helpful. The only unresolved question is how shall the TVMScript be updated as @wrongtest mentioned. As discussed above, we have the options: * B1: In TVMScript, `T.allocate` and `T.decl_buffer` strictly map to the corresponding TIR nodes. To

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Meetup] Next TVM Community Meeting June 8, 2022

2022-06-07 Thread Andrew Reusch via Apache TVM Discuss
Looks like we've got [Buffer Layout Padding RFC](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/77) on the agenda tomorrow. Hope to see you there! --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/next-tvm-community-meeting-june-8-2022/12900/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you e

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)

2022-06-07 Thread Andrew Reusch
this is on the agenda for tomorrow's [community meeting](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/next-tvm-community-meeting-june-8-2022/12900). Perhaps we could discuss in higher bandwidth there? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/77#issuecomm

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] OpNotImplemented: The following operators are not supported for frontend ONNX: GridSample

2022-06-07 Thread TaylorHere via Apache TVM Discuss
`GridSample` has become an ONNX Op since version 16 https://github.com/onnx/onnx/blob/main/docs/Operators.md#GridSample and we already have a `GridSample` implementation https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/10504 maybe we should add this op in tvm --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] Modularizing LLVM codegen/JIT

2022-06-07 Thread Krzysztof Parzyszek via Apache TVM Discuss
I'm working on a prototype now. I want to iron out any additional issues before we go on to discuss more details. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/modularizing-llvm-codegen-jit/12764/38) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsu

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] Modularizing LLVM codegen/JIT

2022-06-07 Thread tqchen via Apache TVM Discuss
A gentle ping to followup, to see if folks have additional thoughts. It might be useful to start with the RAII solution as it is strictly better than what we have now, then continue to improve. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/modularizing-llvm-codegen-jit/12764/37) to

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Introducing DeclBuffer (PR #70)

2022-06-07 Thread Tianqi Chen
A gentle ping. Would be great to have a status checkin and let us move to make this happen -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/70#issuecomment-1148570197 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] A proposed update to the Docker images ci_* tag pattern (PR #66)

2022-06-07 Thread Christopher Sidebottom
> > @leandron, looking at Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com/_/hello-world) it > > would appear the convention for image names is to use `-` there as well > > (i.e. `tlcpack/ci-cpu` rather than `tlcpack/ci_cpu`) can we go for that one? > > Sure. I’ll push an updated version with this and @gromer