Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] A proposed update to the Docker images ci_* tag pattern (PR #66)

2022-06-06 Thread Gustavo Romero
@Mousius I don't have any further comments on it. Are you ok with the current state of this RFC? If so, could you please approve the changes so I can merge it? Thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/66#issuecomment-1148090614 You ar

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][MLF] Model Library Format with Multiple Modules (PR #76)

2022-06-06 Thread Gustavo Romero
Merged #76 into main. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/76#event-6757119416 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77)

2022-06-06 Thread Eric Lunderberg
This RFC introduces a method to specify padding to be applied as part of a buffer layout transformation, to be used when the desired layout does not evenly tile the buffer being transformed, and simplifications that can be performed based on these padded buffers. The motivating examples are pri

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development] [VTA] VTA on ZCU102

2022-06-06 Thread Eamicheal via Apache TVM Discuss
Hi @imharish63 from my earlier post, everything got stuck at the load_module stage, I am not sure why it doesn't progress from that stage,... any idea? For the ZCU104 which tvm commit or version are you currently using? FOr ZCU102 image creation, find my custom [GUIDE_HERE](https://github.com

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][Backend] RFC-CSI-NN2-Integration (PR #75)

2022-06-06 Thread alter-xp
> This is fantastic, thank you! We're excited to hear about the results for > MLPerf. My main comment is mostly concerned about documentation. I'm glad the > build instructions are included with the RFC, but I'd like to see the > inclusion of documentation about how to configure, build, and use