i'm supportive of this idea. i didn't want to derail this RFC by discussing
@kparzysz-quic 's idea about the architecture of the llvm target here, but i
think that would be a good follow-up discussion.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull
> Thanks @Mousius . Given these fields are pretty relevant to compiler
> configurations in traditional domain, it would be nice to also discuss prior
> approaches(e.g. where those fields normally sits in say LLVM) for posterity.
> This would also help us to make meaningful choices that aligns wi
