ok cool, so i think we have these actionables:
- note that when we do a minor release, we check the previous minor release
branch and also do a revision release if there are unreleased changes there
- make it clear that the release manager is responsible to ensure that bugs
raised with the releas
We are more than happy to collaborate on AutoTIR side to make good things
happen :-)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/72#issuecomment-1125461620
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
As one of the co-authors, it glad to see this RFC finally out :)
cc @masahi @ZihengJiang @Laurawly @Hzfengsy @MasterJH5574 @jinhongyii please
help review and share your thoughts. Thanks.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/72#issuecomment
I think it's a good idea overall. I'm in favor of adding more internal
flexibility to targets.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/71#issuecomment-1125416129
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
cc @Mousius @gromero can you approve?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/66#issuecomment-1125243456
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@leandron should we merge this? I think the change has landed in Jenkinsfile now
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/66#issuecomment-1125242931
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
