PTAl, bumped to 0.81, thank you @manupa-arm, @mbaret and @cgerum, you've been
a great help.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/62#issuecomment-1079516472
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Thanks @manupa-arm for slogging through.
> This might enable bring us to down to get the cost estimation but it will
> still explore the combinatorial partitioning possibilities of ops x backends,
> right ? (lmk, if I am wrong here).
Any sensible implementation of CostEstimator should cache by
> No. As far as Collage is concerned it just calls the abstract
> CostEstimator::Estimate interface for each candidate partition, and can
> remain ignorant as to where those costs come from. In the prototype it is
> hard coded to tune, build and run locally to help us get going. Here at
> OctoM
Hi all,
I started a new weekly format for the TVM Community Meetings about a month ago.
In this format, we continue to meet over Zoom, but:
- we change the cadence to a weekly meeting on Wednesdays
- require folks to include a discuss forum or PR link when proposing discussion
topics
- and can
Hi all,
The next TVM Community Meeting is Wednesday, March at 8:00am PST, 16:00 UTC
(4:00pm London), 17:00 CEST, 21:30 India, 24:00 China. This is the first TVM
Community Meeting of 2022 and is unified with the microTVM Community Meeting.
Please note the time change due to Daylight Savings T
1. You are right, we actually tried to save the runtime.Module. We actually
also added the TIR export to the runtime.Module because the generated source
code is also put to it. We will try the different options you proposed as soon
as we can find the time.
2. In the meantime we have written an
[INFO] Reactor Summary for TVM4J Package - Parent 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO]
[INFO] TVM4J Package - Parent . SUCCESS [ 1.313 s]
[INFO] TVM4J Package - Core ... SUCCESS [ 2.587 s]
[INFO] TVM4J Package - Native Parent ..
