Re: [apache/tvm] WIP/RFC: initial stab at TorchScript fallback (#7401)

2022-03-07 Thread Masahiro Masuda
Great! Can you remove `WIP` from the title now? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7401#issuecomment-1061502358 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] WIP/RFC: initial stab at TorchScript fallback (#7401)

2022-03-07 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, so I rebased this finally and it all compiles and runs one test against a current PyTorch master, so I think I'm back in business with this PR (unless it has been obsoleted, but from what I understand, the bridge is in the other direction). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on Gi

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation (Issue #10471)

2022-03-07 Thread Siyuan Feng
+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#issuecomment-1061312750 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] Pattern matching pass

2022-03-07 Thread masahi via Apache TVM Discuss
You need to use the `MergeComposite` pass. You can search its usage in our repo. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/pattern-matching-pass/12249/2) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](http

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] UMA: Universal Modular Accelerator Interface

2022-03-07 Thread Andrew Reusch via Apache TVM Discuss
thanks! feel free to open an RFC PR and we can iterate there if you like. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-uma-universal-modular-accelerator-interface/12039/15) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these email

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/pre-RFC] [RFC] UMA: Universal Modular Accelerator Interface

2022-03-07 Thread Michael J Klaiber via Apache TVM Discuss
Thanks everyone for the detailed input and feedback! To keep track of the **latest version** of the UMA pre-RFC and to add the **great suggestions that we got from this discussion thread**, I created a document in our tvm-rfc fork : https://github.com/boschresearch/tvm-rfcs/blob/rfc_uma/rfcs/0

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation (Issue #10471)

2022-03-07 Thread Manupa Karunaratne
+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#issuecomment-1060839292 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Replace codeowners with more relevant automation (Issue #10471)

2022-03-07 Thread Eric Lunderberg
+1 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10471#issuecomment-1060835861 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: