Thanks for the RFC. Will review next week.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/57#issuecomment-1045334149
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
AttrStmt was our historical way to create extensions. While it offered quite
some convenience, it also created a dilemma that it may introduce new language
extensions that may become incompatible with the existing semantics. e.g. an
old pass may no longer be compatible with a new extension sem
This is definitely interesting usecases which unifies "AttrStmt" with
definitions of Attr otherwhere in the codebase. Given `AttrStmt` is something
we wanted to move away from, I would love to confirm with @tqchen that the
change is acceptable
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache
This PR is closed due to a rename branch problem.
Please refer to new PR (https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/10308)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9875#issuecomment-1044412038
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this threa
Previous [PR](https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9875) is closed due to a
rename branch problem.
Pre-RFC
(https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-familyseer-a-new-search-method-for-auto-scheduler/11877)
in forum.
tvm-rfcs (https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/57)
You can view, comment on, or mer
RFC topic in forum:
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-familyseer-a-new-search-method-for-auto-scheduler/11877
@comaniac @junrushao1994
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/57
-- Commit Summary --
* Create 0052-FamilySeer
@fPecc, Andrew @areusch has agreed to put it on the agenda of the next
community meeting. Would be great to have as many interested community members
there as possible to collect requirements and find a sweet spot for the API 👍.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-uma-
@areusch @paulpb is there going to be a discussion about this feature, perhaps
on a community meeting? I would like to be there, I think this feature will
greatly help the future integration of accelerators, something I am extremely
interested in.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ap
Hi~ I think this is not the issue of tvmscript. For example, though
`List[Integer]` is supported by script, it would fail in lowering with `Illegal
attribute of key pragma_key, value type Array not supported`, since the
annotation can not convert to an attr stmt.
```python
import tvm
from t
[quote="wrongtest, post:1, topic:12118"]
But certain pragma annotations can not get lowerer to `T.attr`，only those of
expression typed values are allowed
[/quote]
Would you like to elaborate? Currently the type of `AttrStmtNode::value` is
`PrimExpr`, but which type cannot be supported by TVMSc
Schedule annotations of `For` and `Block` are all Map. But
certain pragma annotations can not get lowerer to `T.attr`，only those of
expression typed values are allowed.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/can-we-lift-tir-attrstmt-value-type-to-objectref/12118/1)
to respond
11 matches
Mail list logo
