Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Update script block syntax (#41)

2021-10-07 Thread Tianqi Chen
THanks @Hzfengsy , looks like a great update that makes the intend clear -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/41#issuecomment-938152672

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][TIR] Separate physical and logical layout of buffers (#39)

2021-10-07 Thread Lunderberg
Following a video chat with @csullivan, documenting some of the key points of the conversation. * Setting the physical layout in a TE-based schedule has two roles. One is the rewrite the buffer itself, and the other is to define the order of iteration when writing to the buffer. In the latter

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC][TIR] Separate physical and logical layout of buffers (#39)

2021-10-07 Thread Lunderberg
> How will vectorization work? If there is a `vectorize` directive spanning a > logical extent, will the vectorization pass create multidimensional `ramp`s? > How will vector loads and stores be represented? While in principle a vectorized load/store could fallback to a non-vectorized load/stor

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Update script block syntax (#41)

2021-10-07 Thread Siyuan Feng
Thanks @junrushao1994. The reference has updated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/41#issuecomment-937708016