+1
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-923534664
+1, let's try this
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-923490887
+1 TQ
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-923484930
+1
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-923468663
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22324 for more context.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/9057#issuecomment-923462200
hey @xiebaiyuan you might take a look at the microTVM autoTVM
infrastructure--it should be reusable for wasm.
-
https://tvm.apache.org/docs/tutorials/micro/micro_autotune.html#sphx-glr-tutorials-micro-micro-autotune-py
- https://github.com/apache/tvm/blob/main/python/tvm/micro/build.py#L67
--
Dear Community:
We recently started using GitHub's CODEOWNERS to assign reviewers automatically
but many committers have complained that they are struggling with the default
settings assigning far too many pull requests to far too many people and not
providing fair scheduling across all reviewe
> I apologise for the wall of requested changes @gromero, I've been very nit
> picky over the clarity of the markdown which I think a find/replace will
> almost immediately fix the majority of.
>
> Overall this all sounds sensible and makes sense to me as a change.
@Mousius Actually, thanks a lo
Closed #8997.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8997#event-5329389331
Hi @junrushao1994 ,
We have discussed this internally and we find referring to NDArrays in IRModule
attributes seems reasonable through tir.allocate_const nodes. I'll do a pass to
modify the text in the RFC.
@d-smirnov, any thought from you ? -- I think we will have to store the
NDArrays as IR
Thanks @junrushao1994 , it would be great if we could finalize the RFC here
because it has a cascading effect to the USMP RFC and certain PRs waiting on it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 October 2020.
The report for your podling will form a part of the
Thanks for the really helpful discussion! The design choice looks good to me :-)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/23#issuecomment-922678867
13 matches
Mail list logo
